A/D: Teachers in the past have more influence on students than they do today.
Some people think that teachers nowadays have more influence on students than before. However, I argue that teachers in the past have more impact on students than they do today. Therefore, I agree with the statement with the following reasons.
First of all, students cares about the quality of education on students, and teachers in the past had more excellent teaching skills than nowadays. For example, approximate 50 years ago, teachers usually used brilliant notes on blackboard to teach students and ask them to copy on the notebook. Moreover, teacher also create some quizs everyday to help students brush the subjects, such as Chinese and math. As a result, students in the past learned very well and efficiently because of teachers. Yet, in contemporary time, teachers usually use simple Powerpoint to educate students. Apparently, students nowadays should spend extra time to realize the content on the textbook by themselves rather than by teachers.
Secondly, parents usually intervene in education between teachers and students nowadays, so they might ask teachers to follow their approaches to teach students. For instance, when I was a student at Cheng Kung Elementary School, my mom always came to school to ask teachers for spending more time on English instead of physical education. In addition, she might complain to principal about teachers sometimes. As a consequence, almost all the education policies were come from my mom instead of from my teachers. Nonetheless, previous teachers educated students without any interfering because they were respected by people. Obviously, teachers in the past had more influence on students than nowadays.
Last but not least, learning resource plays an important role in students in modern time, so students nowadays can less depend on teachers to learn new things. For example, when I was a student at Cheng Kung Junior High School, I usually learned math by the extra textbooks from the bookstores reather by teachers. Additionally, I also searched mathmatic questions via computers. Consequently, learning resource has greater impact on me than teachers nowadays. Nevertheless, if students wanted to learn math well, they needed to highly depend on teachers due to the lack of learning resource. Hence, previous teachers had a tremendous influence on students.
In conclusion, I agree that teachers in the past have more influence on students than they do today. After all, the quality of education, parents ,and learning resource highly influence on students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-20 | kevin1105 | 68 | view |
| 2020-07-09 | James Douvyl | 73 | view |
- A D It is more important for the government to spend money on art museums and concert halls than on recreational facilities such as swimming pools and playgrounds 73
- A university is considering establishing a new requirement for graduation in addition to its normal requirements about completing coursework all students must attend a course on public speaking to develop skills that will be useful in speaking in front of 73
- In many companies there is a mentoring system senior workers in a company will be required to mentor younger workers but in recent years some companies have also required younger workers to mentor senior workers Do you agree or disagree with the following 73
- During the times of economic crisis which of the following should the government spend less money on a Education b Health Care c Support for the unemployed 66
- It is important to have rules about the kind of clothing people should wear to go to work and school 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...oreover, teacher also create some quizs everyday to help students brush the subjects, su...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r all, the quality of education, parents ,and learning resource highly influence o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, after all, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39546599496 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80173232382 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498740554156 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3634526919 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1304347826 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2608695652 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4347826087 5.45110844103 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.51590401902 0.236089414692 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180947405227 0.076458572812 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.215456503647 0.0737576698707 292% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.383497694564 0.150856017488 254% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.178327359586 0.0645574589148 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.