Agree or disagree. It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time.
In modern-day life, people often need to deal with lots of project whether in schools or works. Some people may prefer to work on multiple projects at the same time, while others thinks it is better to finish a project completely before starting another one. To me, I can only focus on one project at one time, so I totally agree with the statement shows in the prompt.
To begin with, if people work on project one at a time, the project can have a better quality. In modern life, people always have the requirement of doing many projects. When people work on one project at a time, it can save them lots of time and people can use these time to improve the quality of the project. On the other hand, when people are working on many projects at the same time, people often feel panic because they think that they cannot finish the projects on time. Besides, working multiple projects at the same time can also be time-wasting. For instance, when I first start my high school year, I usually work on many projects at the same time. Our projects were mostly work in groups. Therefore, since each projects require different group members, I spend most of my time switching to different groups, so my first year did not turn out very good. As a result, I changed the method in my second year, I start to work on only a project at a time. I usually meet with just one group until we finish the project, then I will move to the second one. By doing this, I can have more time to discover more specific detail and improve my projects. Indeed, I think people should really work one project at a time instead of multiple at the same time.
In addition, it can reduce the chance of making mistakes when people work on project one at a time. To be more specific, when people do more than one project at a time, they need to switch to other subjects and our brain are very likely to forget about some specific details. Take geology and geography as an example, they are extremely similar, even some of the term use in the projects are similar too. Therefore, if students are working on these two projects at the same time, it can be easy for them to tangle with some information. So, their projects will not be impress by the professors and this will definitely decrease their school grade. As a result, if students only have to deal with one subject at a time, it can prevent them from making the mistake between these similar terms. Thus, it is essential for students to work on only one subject at a time.
Undoubtedly, some people may say that it is better to work on multiple projects at the same time, because it can save people lots of time. However, people will have a better result when they are working on projects one at a time. As a result, I think people should work on a project completely before moving to the next one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-03 | neda77aa | 3 | view |
| 2020-11-03 | neda77aa | 3 | view |
| 2020-10-10 | Morteza1990 | 66 | view |
| 2020-07-12 | amininilooffar | 81 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | M.S 2019 | 3 | view |
- Whether wheat discovered in the Britain was wrongly dated 60
- Should children pend most of the time playing and studying or they should be required to help the family with household chores, like cooking and cleaning. 70
- Agree or disagree. It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time. 66
- TED 73
- burning mirror 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ample, they are extremely similar, even some of the term use in the projects are similar to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, then, therefore, thus, while, even so, for instance, i think, in addition, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2306.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 523.0 407.700716846 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40917782027 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27584389435 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.374760994264 0.524837075471 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.0 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 13.0 3.51792114695 370% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8690492713 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.24 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.92 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495274829286 0.236089414692 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199254876666 0.076458572812 261% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106531624761 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.362443624611 0.150856017488 240% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596503552467 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 10.9000537634 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.38 8.01818996416 80% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.