Agree or disagree: News sources in the past were more concerned about the accuracy of the news compared to the news sources today.
In general, being a reliable source of news is considered among the most important aspects of a media. Every moment, a wide variety of events occur worldwide, and these events are reflected in (the) media. Since people refer to these sources based on their accuracy, it is of great importance to care about this issue. In this regard, many people wonder how the accuracy of the news was in past compared to today's news. A common idea is that news sources were more concerned about being accurate in the past, but I am completely against it. In the following lines, I will explain two reasons to shed light on my answer.
The first noteworthy idea is that there is a real competition in media today. Today’sworld is considered a fully connected world; it means all news is spread in at light speed immediately due to a large group of people working in media besides having a fast internet based connections. By having considered this, people will count on accurate media, so it turns the media industry into a competitive environment which has no room for any mistakes in news. For example, suppose a TV channel which reports the election results prior to the authorities. This mistake will lead to catastrophe, and the media will lose its reputation. By saying this, today compared to the past, preserving accuracy in news is of great importance to have a role in this competition.
The second reason comes into my mind is readers’ awareness about false news. Today, people are making decisions based on daily news published in the media. Having considered this fact, they have to distinguish between these sources to find out the most trustworthy information source. As a result of this effort, no excuses are accepted about misleading information. For example, take a keen businessman who chooses stocks based on analysis offered by the local newspaper. Because it is vital to have accurate information for a successful trade, any problem with statistics offered by the newspaper will not be tolerated.
By To wrap everything up in the end, having analyzes the preceding ideas, one can conclude that today’s media, compared to the past, are more concerned about accuracy of their news so that to preserve their place in competition and respect their readers awareness.
- Tpo40 80
- Agree or disagree: News sources in the past were more concerned about the accuracy of the news compared to the news sources today. 83
- Agree or disagree: News sources in the past were more concerned about the accuracy of the news compared to the news sources today. 76
- Agree or disagree: News sources in the past were more concerned about the accuracy of the news compared to the news sources today. 90
- Agree/disagree: people should spend time to try many jobs before they choose along-term job. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a medium' or simply 'media'?
Suggestion: a medium; media
...red among the most important aspects of a media. Every moment, a wide variety of events...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...group of people working in media besides having a fast internet based connections...
^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this competition. The second reason comes into my mind is readers' awar...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y the newspaper will not be tolerated. By To wrap everything up in the end, hav...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, second, so, for example, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99216710183 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8146601624 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537859007833 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4072902759 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.631578947 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1578947368 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63157894737 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350271411169 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112233377313 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121666227793 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236510613497 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109703743751 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.