Agree or disagree? Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together.
With the rapid advancement of modern technology, the pace of daily life has changed dramatically. People nowadays are increasingly busy than ever. As a result, people spend less time with their family and have fewer regularly meals with their beloved ones. However, personally, I don’t think it’s proper to leave out family meals because regularly meals can bring us benefits including experience sharing and enhancing relationships.
First of all, family meals provide an opportunity for both parents and children to share their recent experience and learn from each other. During family meals, parents can talk about their work and exchange their insight about social events. Therefore, children can have a better understanding of what is happening in the real world. In addition to discussing social events, parents are able to cultivate individual views of the children. For example, my mother is used to talk about interesting things she encountered in her work. She has been working as a software engineering for many years. I gained a lot of engineering knowledge from her at a very young age, and it even made me plan to be an engineer in the future.
Secondly, in addition to sharing experiences of family members, regularly family meals also help to promote relationships between the members. There are several factors contributing to this point. First, the preparation of family meals requires communication skills. Through the discussion of different tasks, the skill of tactic understanding can be easily cultivated. Second, when meals are finished, mutual compliments are likely to remove previous misunderstandings and bring family members closer together. This process is especially important for couples because we all know that passion between lovers tends to decrease as time goes by. Regularly family meals strengthen their bonds and make it possible for couples to communicate and appreciate their love and care for their companion. Therefore, family meals play an important part in building up close relationships between family members.
Finally, strong evidence suggests that having family meals can improve health conditions. Recent research conducted by the National Health Research Center (NHRC) in my country suggests that family meals increase people’s mood. As a result, people become more energetic and healthier by having meals together. Although it is hard to imagine such a simple process can result in the improvement of health, family meals are proved to be painkillers for people who suffer from depression or anxiety.
In conclusion, although modern life can be overwhelming and people nowadays have less free time, it is still significantly important to spend time gathering with families on the table because it not only enhances the family relationship but also warm the heart of each family member. Furthermore, family meals also improve people’s health condition and help to develop a better living.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | amir_gha67 | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | prsghsm | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | NIMA SAEEDI | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | sparktseng | 60 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | handsomepot | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are differentr 76
- To preserve old historic buildings vs to replace them with new modern buildings 73
- To preserve old historic buildings vs to replace them with new modern buildings 91
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2516.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48148148148 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90863789202 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553376906318 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 775.8 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7208538513 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.64 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.36 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397243442992 0.236089414692 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107522043401 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742162783611 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230227418692 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683432218194 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.