Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Nowadays, in is not important for people to have regularly family meals together.
In modern society, people have different behaviors rather than old people because everything has changed. In ancient times, people preferred to have pleasure times with their family, but nowadays this is not very important for people. Today's people like to experience new things without their family's interference. The reasons substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, nowadays young people want to be friends with people who are of their age. Youngsters, prefer to be a lot of time with their friends because they can better understand each other and causes they no pay attention to their family, therefore, after a while, they become indifferent to their family. To further illustration, I would like to explain personal history. Last summer, I decided to experience new restaurants in my hometown with my friends. Every day, we went to a luxurious restaurant and ate special food. After weeks, I realized that my family was upset about my behavior, but I did not accept their criticism because I liked to do my hobbies with my friends. Better to say that, my decision caused some things like eating food, watching TV or even talking with the family were not significant for me. As you can see, people are able to choose their way which can change their relationships with their family.
Secondly, among today's people some comportment such as sleeping late, wake up late, playing with mobile, etc., are very common that can influence spirit. These behaviors have negative impacts and provoke people to do actions that are abnormal like keep away from family. Recent studies show people due to the reasons mentioned in the first line paragraph have depression, so this situation acts on their mentality. For example, when one person has dejection it is usual that he/she prefers to live alone because he/she has conditions which cause he/she to lose his/her some feeling. Thus, even a simple thing like eating meals with family is very hard for him/her. Ultimately, we should know that there are many reasons that people prefer to be alone even while eating foods.
In conclusion, taking all the reasons and examples into account, I believe that people have different ideas which cause want to be solitary, also for the reasons the family is an unvalued thing for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | amir_gha67 | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | prsghsm | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | NIMA SAEEDI | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | sparktseng | 60 | view |
| 2019-05-02 | handsomepot | 90 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It’s the best way for teachers to help students more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside the school. 76
- There is some theories about the agnostides which had been extincted 450millions years ago. 81
- Which one do you think is important to long – lasting friendship?1.Help you when you need 2.Share same interest and hobby3.Trust 70
- Summaries the points made in the lecture,being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. two hypotheses about see otters populations declining 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1929.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0497382199 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51012177577 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573298429319 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0585734533 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.526315789 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1052631579 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22125925542 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736997636907 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544876598611 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152359438179 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288915862931 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.