Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they change the specific arguments presented in the reading passage.
The reading and lecture are both about creating new rules for power plants that produce coal ash by burning that in the United States is a significant issue. The author of reading believes that the government should create strict regulations. The lecture challenges the statements made by the lecture. She is of the opinion that having severe rules are necessary for companies.
First of all, the author suggests that the government has effective regulations for companies and is not necessary to create new rules, because one of the regulation is this that companies should use liner instrument to prevent from flowing coal cash into the soil. This idea is challenged by the lecture. Professor says these regulations are not sufficient for this issue, because they have not special impact on the company. Furthermore, he argues that exist regulations use for new ponds and landfills and the company ignores to add liner for old ponds and landfills, so this event cause coal ash components to leak into the environment.
Secondly, the writer contends that creating harsh rules cause stop the recycling of coal cash. The article notes that already this cycle causes some building materials are produced in this way, but if severe regulations make, consumers probably will stop buying the recycled coal ash products. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that dangerous materials like mercury have strict rules for handling and storing, but this substance has recycled over 50 years and purchasers have had few concerns about it. She elaborates on this be mentioning that strict rules cannot be a hurdle for buyers to purchase the recycled products.
Finally, it is stated in the article that strict new rules can increase the costs of disposal and handling. The author establishes that these costs will increase the price of electricity. The lecture stated that albeit this statement is true, but the costs of implementing these rules are 15 billion dollars. He puts forth the idea that this cost can math with the household electricity, because the bill of the electricity may increase by about one percent, which is not a huge thing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | NIMA SAEEDI | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | zhrnrz1992 | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | dorsagh | 86 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | Aylahh | 88 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they change the specific arguments presented in the reading passage. 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. imposing high taxes on cigarettes 75
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage. 3
- Are governments doing well in educating people to pay attention to the importance of the food nutrition and healthy eating? 78
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nment should create strict regulations. The lecture challenges the statements made ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1801.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 352.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11647727273 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6016880422 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511363636364 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.9 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2902231292 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5625 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06452816374 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0494804591047 0.272083759551 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0259202106215 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374639524272 0.0662205650399 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.035000396608 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295122837585 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.