TPO 41
Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they change the specific arguments presented in the reading passage.
making sever rules for recycling of coal ash.
n this set of materials, the reading and the listening have a debate about making sever rules for recycling of coal ash. The writer puts forward 3 main reasons which are refuted by following speaker.
First, the writer suggests that usage of liner in new disposal lands is obligatory for preventing of diffusion of contamination in to surrounding places. The speaker views this issue from an opposite angle. According to him, using liner in new pounds and landfills is not sufficient; because old disposal lands need to repair and maintenance to prevent from diffusion of contamination.
Second point offered by writer is that people may be concern about danger of recycling products and this fact reduce their desire for cooperating with government in this matter. On contrary, the speaker casts doubt on this presumption by saying a similar story about mercury. When people found that it is very dangerous they collaborate more with the government.
Last, the writer opposes that not only power companies should pay more money for linering in storage of coal ash, but they also increase electricity tution which due to unsatisfying consumers. In the other hand, the professor holds an opposite view. He claims that this addition in coast is really wealthy. Each 1% addition in storage fee will compensate 50 bi $ price for cleaning of environment. As a result, it is s kind of investment for future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-30 | zhrnrz1992 | 80 | view |
- TPO 29 83
- TPO 41Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they change the specific arguments presented in the reading passage. making sever rules for recycling of coal ash. 88
- tpo 47Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.Pterosaurs 88
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much moreeffectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: N
n this set of materials, the reading and ...
^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is not sufficient; because old disposal lands need to repair and maintenance to ...
^^^
Line 9, column 277, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y saying a similar story about mercury. When people found that it is very dangerous ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w. He claims that this addition in coast is really wealthy. Each 1% addition in ...
^^
Line 13, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that this addition in coast is really wealthy. Each 1% addition in storage fee...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, really, second, so, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10344827586 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7709372364 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655172413793 0.540411800872 121% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0560632437 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0769230769 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8461538462 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290882331546 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820649625465 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077797841341 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158176197054 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406411458731 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.