Agree or disagree: In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources.

Essay topics:

Agree or disagree: In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources.

Nowadays, . News as tools for clarifing people from different happens in world have significnt impcat on our life which gathering data and information and anlysis these inforamtion cn be a chalenging act in poepl life. So, PErsonally I belive that getting inforamtion from differn sourcess is a bet

To begins, people can better judge about their environment changes more rational if they access to broad range of informtion from different sourcess. People decisions in their every day life have affected by different information from their people all around them and all news and socil media that pump news and informtion to their views. Social media, The internet, and all other socurce of geting information from all around rhe world have greater impact on our decisions and life than other trditional ways that we know. People can easlly mislead by these vase amount of informatiion from various source of news. Therefore, if people want to have good decisions based on these vast amount of data, they should get information from different sourcess.

Also, parties in countries attempt to use their power to control social media to achieve their goals which like classical view about politics, politicans can use power in any form that they like to fullfed their goals, people can harm from truthless information that gained from single source. Social media is a powerfull tool for parties and politicans to dictate their words to people and control people in way they like. Therefore, persons should get access to different source of views to see fact and truth form huge unclear informton that can be truthless and bias. Although it is essential for governments to use different ways to control their people, control in way that harm indivudals privacy and freedom can be unacceptable. As a result, for have unbias and misleaded view to different circumestancess, people should get informaton from different sourcess

Finally, poeple can judge about different situtions tht happen in all around the world and n their daily life and have unbis view to their world by geting access to informaton and data from various sourcess of news. Not only geting information from differnt sourcess leads great improvment in our socity and human rights but also it brings more rationality in our desicions

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-05 Somayya 76 view
2020-01-05 Somayya 76 view
2020-01-04 morteza shz 73 view
2019-11-11 barb 80 view
2019-10-09 地狱博士后 66 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, . News as tools for clarifing people fro...
^^
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
Nowadays, . News as tools for clarifing people from...
^^
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...informtion to their views. Social media, The internet, and all other socurce of g...
^^
Line 7, column 555, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this vase' or 'these vases'?
Suggestion: this vase; these vases
...t we know. People can easlly mislead by these vase amount of informatiion from various sou...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, therefore, as to, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15733333333 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61285426552 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.9536598747 48.9658058833 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.166666667 100.406767564 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.25 20.6045352989 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197119626463 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850159264959 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496123011715 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143056028395 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365093178653 0.0645574589148 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 11.7677419355 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.247311828 185% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.