Agree or disagree a teacher should share his or her social and political views with students
The ideas a teacher claims during a class are one of the most crucial information one receives in life, as it leads to social activity and decision making and shapes one's ensuing life. Hence, one of the most controversial issues amongst many lecturers is to share their personal thoughts with students or to keep them secretive. As far as I am concerned in the state of ambivalence, I might lean toward not sharing personal ideas with younger students. Conceivably, many people believe that a teacher must include the political and social perspectives, however, there are many reasons such as the possibility of shaping a student's mind, wrongly and confusing a teenager can declare a higher beneficiary of keeping a teacher's mind pattern ambiguous.
First, changing a young person's mindset is disadvantageous due to the permanent lifestyle-changing included in it. Doubtlessly, mindset can help to broaden decision making and changing one's future path. To build a student believes many concepts contradict such as personal experiences, parents, and environment, in which a teacher can easily overcome all the other aspects because of the higher position a lecturer has between the educators. Granted, a teacher has perfect views about everything, but it is not going to work well on a student holding different beliefs. As an illustrative example, some years ago during high school, I attended Beheshti high school in Iran. Between my colleagues, there was a girl called Sara. Sara was from a religious family while our teacher did not believe in God. In the beginning, Sara ignored the teacher's comments, but things did not go as planned. Unfortunately, Sara's viewpoint changed drastically and her parents accused her most of the time. Sara was meant to stay religious throughout her whole life, but the teacher changed her path. As one can see, teacher comments can affect a student's mind and associated with the student's future way of living.
Secondly, it is not presumptuous to judge a teenager's confusion over many things based on the different ideas the young person receives. A man can not truly assume that an educator's views are different from parents, but it is more likable that there is some diffraction between them. A student who has absolutely no solid idea might have heard different viewpoints about the same concept and that led to the student's disability to take a single route. My personal experiences are the foundation of my next point, teachers ideas can be different from the environment a student lives and reflect the disability of finding the truth. Surely, it is wiser for a teacher to stop mentioning personal ideas than denying the possible harms it can make on students and make them into bipolar adolescents. I am of the convection that one student needs to make the beliefs through time and doesn't need any confusion. This is my suggestion and the effects are evident in the bipolarity and consequent path changing in teenagers. Regarding the aforementioned reason, I conclude that an educator should stop claiming about social or political points, but a coin has two sides and an edge to connect them so there are cases when a teacher must claim his or her ideas to survive a student.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...rn ambiguous. First, changing a young persons mindset is disadvantageous due to the p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teenagers'' or 'teenager's'?
Suggestion: teenagers'; teenager's
...ndly, it is not presumptuous to judge a teenagers confusion over many things based on the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ut the same concept and that led to the students disability to take a single route. My p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 879, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ds to make the beliefs through time and doesnt need any confusion. This is my suggesti...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2690.0 1977.66487455 136% => OK
No of words: 534.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03745318352 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87818638237 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520599250936 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 844.2 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4807014199 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.956521739 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2173913043 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26511109628 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681104048569 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579281908197 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176665603285 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00844998823264 0.0645574589148 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.