Agree or disagree. in twenty years there will be less cars used compared to now
Transportation is done in many ways, and of one the paramount means of transportation is personal cars. I am of the conviction that the number of private vehicles is going to decrease gradually, to an advantageous society. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will interpret in the following essay.
First of all, environmental pollution has become a critical problem in recent years, and cars add to this problem. For one thing, studies assert that urban places, with more cars, are much polluted compared to rural areas. For another thing, personal cars are much older, compared to public vehicles; therefore, they pollute the air, soil, and water more compared to other transportation means. If it wasn't for these cars, the total earth pollution would decrease. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I remember when I was a college student, I lived in a capital city, with lots of air pollution. I had a friend with lung problems and she was always frustrated and tired because of her health condition. Once, she went to a doctor to consult about her condition, and the specialist told her to leave the city to a place without cars. She left school and our city for one semester, and the result was mesmerizing, she was no longer suffering. As a result, she made a campaign to reduce personal vehicle usage, and thanks to her our city has become less polluted since then. For this reason, I believe that people would understand all the pollution a car can make, sooner or later, and try to decrease its usage.
Ostensibly, private cars are more convenient for transportation, but the trend is already changing in many developed countries. Granted, the car's convenience we will use them, but public transportation's feasibility is changing this matter. For instance, When I first came to Japan, a relatively developed country, I became surprised about their transportation system. That time I had a professor with a high income.
He could buy as many cars as he wanted, but he always commutes between school and home with a subway. Once, I asked him about the reason, and he said that subways are faster, less tiring, and less bothersome. He was completely right about his assumption; consequently, I have stopped using my car since then. This plan paves the way for both my expenditure, and time management, and I believe that more and more people will choose public transporting instead of the car in the future.
In conclusion, I am of the option that, cars will be used less in the future, It is because they make lots of pollution and because public transportation will be more convenient by then.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ed to other transportation means. If it wasnt for these cars, the total earth polluti...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'transportations'' or 'transportation's'?
Suggestion: transportations'; transportation's
...onvenience we will use them, but public transportations feasibility is changing this matter. Fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion will be more convenient by then.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, then, therefore, another thing, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, for another thing, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86607745883 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513333333333 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 14.0 1.86738351254 750% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5092459661 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0869565217 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5652173913 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04347826087 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160199121306 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445970924388 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059018471182 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110403232533 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763683270345 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.