Asking questions from coworkers or teachers and super-visors
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">The time one spends to learn new concepts is one of the most crucial periods in life; as learning leads one to obtain knowledge and infroamtion and shape the ensuing future. Hence one of the highly controversial issues amongs many individuals is from whom they should ask their questions. As far as I am concerend , i the state of ambivalence, I might lean toward learnign from people with same amount of experience and knowledge. Conceivably, some people believe that we should ask from more infromative ones, however, many resons such as level of understaning and ability to ask many questtions ,which are paramount points in learning, can declare the higher beneficiary of learning from fellow people. I will interpert my responce in teh following essay.
First, level of undestanding are advantageous due to the valuable information that included understaning. Doubtlessly, such information help to boarden the knowledge and knowledge obtainment. Consequently, this will enrich one's abilities. To improve this level one needs to share same amount of knowledge; consepts such as same background, academic grade, etc. which can not be same with a person with higher wisdom. Granted a person with knowledge can share more with a person, but if the person can not understand them it is useless. As an illustrative example, some years ago, during my school time at Beheshti high school in Iran, there was a girl, named Sara, Sara was intelligent and hard-working and always asked her problems from the teacher, not attending grounp meetigns. In the beginning, everyone tought her grades would be all-perfect but this was not the case. Unfortunately, Sara got some bad scores in some subjects, and she accused her own behaviour. Although her spent time with the teacher was meant to solve her problems, things did not go as planned due to her not understaning the teacher's talks completely. As one can see, to understand concepts, one need to share same knowledge background and this associates with personal knowledge level.
Also, it is not presumptuous to judge another's amount of asked questions according to the knowledge level. No man can evr truley understand other's mindset and behaviour, but a man can be more willing to ask unrrelevent questions from a colleague due to the confidence level. Two people who appear comfortably asking questions may be fellow students with same level of information. My personal experiences are teh foundation of my point. A person needs some one to ask many questions to gain much knowledge and the level of confidence directly influences the hesitence reinfocing this is imperative for asking questions. Surely, it must be wiser to respect co-workers than to deny them to gain more knowledge.
I am of the conviction that everyone needs fellow peole, people whom with you share same background and don't hesitate to ask questions from. This is a personal sugestion and the effects benefits, knowledge and undestandability. Regarding the aforemntioned reasons, I conclude that asking from fellows is a better choice. All in All, a coin has two sides and an edge to connect them; so, it might be better to gain infromation from both types of people.</span><br>
- Students in a university club want to help others, but they can only choose one project a year, which one of the following is the best? 1. Help those students in a nearby primary school with reading and mathematics; 2. Help people who cannot afford to bui 70
- TPO 12 80
- Agree or disagree some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Other thinks access to so much information creates problem 73
- TPO 14 83
- old freind vs. new freind 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...froamtion and shape the ensuing future. Hence one of the highly controversial issues ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...heir questions. As far as I am concerend , i the state of ambivalence, I might lea...
^^
Line 1, column 641, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...aning and ability to ask many questtions ,which are paramount points in learning, ...
^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ainment. Consequently, this will enrich ones abilities. To improve this level one ne...
^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
... foundation of my point. A person needs some one to ask many questions to gain much know...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...whom with you share same background and dont hesitate to ask questions from. This is...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2724.0 1977.66487455 138% => OK
No of words: 524.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19847328244 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7844588288 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14190461756 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511450381679 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 830.7 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2795747367 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.769230769 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.03846153846 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179465991895 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516915588205 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610206928215 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132974353911 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493920488095 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 86.8835125448 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.