All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Most people agree that history should be a mandatory subject for the entire number of students in university. Personally, I do believe that the mentioned course doesn`t play an important role on the formation of academic background. I am of this opinion for two specific reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, everyone learns about the history of their country or more in undergraduate classes in high school or lower grades. Hence, it might not be necessary to take further courses in a field that they are not interested. For example, If I was in the university, I wouldn`t want to learn more about the past. Today, I think I have gained enough knowledge based on the fact that since the last year of high school, I have had a history class each year where I obtained information not only about the past events of my country, but also of the whole world. Therefore, students who are not keen on, would be upset like me if their professors would expect from them to show interest on these topics.
Moreover, there is no denying that there is a plethora of requirements for undergraduate that seeks for hard work, patience and efforts. To be more specific, students of other fields are too busy with assignments, preparation for exams or presantions, that they do not need extra courses to loose their time. Moreover, there is a significant possibility that if their study degree is far away from history, they will probably fail. Consequently, this situation can affect the time of graduation. For instance, my personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. I remember in the final year of school when I studied Biology, the Evolution of plants subject was compulsory. I always considered it as not necessary and was concentrating in other subjects . It took me more time to prepare for the exam due to the fact that I was not interested on learning it. In addition, I did not managed to graduate on time and waited until next semester.
Taking everything into consideration, more concrete the stated arguments make me to think that the obligatory requirement of history courses in university is not acceptable. Even though someone might believe it is beneficial, I strongly put forth the idea that the disadvantages of providing these programs overweight the advantages for the reasons I have mentioned in the text.
- All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 76
- usage of these cooper cylinders as electric batteries in the antiquity 83
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 76
- To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 76
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would he more satisfying 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... that they do not need extra courses to loose their time. Moreover, there is a signif...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 762, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... and was concentrating in other subjects . It took me more time to prepare for the...
^^
Line 3, column 891, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'manage'
Suggestion: manage
... on learning it. In addition, I did not managed to graduate on time and waited until ne...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment of history courses in university is not acceptable. Even though someone migh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93266832918 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94730668033 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56608478803 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8428605896 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.105263158 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1052631579 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225108467751 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592149267052 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689247951829 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124924929681 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0105209278487 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.