In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Whereas some people think that it is difficult today to choose our future career, others do not believe so. Personally, I strongly disagree that the past offered more opportunities to find a secure and successful job. I am of this opinion for two reasons which I will examine in the following essay.
First and foremost, the whole range of information that we gain from numerous media was for sure not available times before. Nowadays, there are obviously publishments about research papers, articles on Internet, newspapers, magazines or even TV shows. Consequently, we have the chance to be informed consciously and unconsciously for career possibilities that can result on success and professional growth. In contrast, in the past, I hardly do believe that any of these canals have existed. For example, my grandmother has told me that when she was in my age, she started her career as a tailer because her mother learned her how to sew even though a few years later, the demand for tailored clothes began to decrease. It was the time when clothing shops were opening everywhere. Moreover, she also told me that the same thing has happened to the majority of her friends. Hence, they had not the opportunity to choose by themselves their career or to inform about it before. As a result, the lack of information led them to an unsuccessful professional life.
Secondly, the actual market offers us a plethora of advantages to find a secure job based on the fact that we can work in various places until we find the perfect one where we feel we have the ability and skills to perform well. For instance, If I had to choose If I am more capable to work in a bank or to open an accounting office on my own, I would primarily try the first option. Thus, if I see that I can not grow professionally on this area, I would immediately start preparing for the other alternative. Not only self- identification, but contrary to the past, career centers also help us by offering career programs, services and consults.
In conclusion, I support the view that it is easier today rather than in the past to find the appropriate career. This is because now we are surrounded by different kind of information and more beneficial services that help us gain a better understanding about future job market. As a result, we have the ability to gain broad, in- depth knowledge about every job and workplace.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would he more satisfying 70
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 76
- To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 76
- burning mirror 90
- Describe one of the most important days in your life and why it was so important to you Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75961538462 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84704702721 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2267514087 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.210526316 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8947368421 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78947368421 5.45110844103 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191381036934 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561426844475 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505998376555 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124433317602 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030177002127 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75961538462 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84704702721 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2267514087 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.210526316 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8947368421 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78947368421 5.45110844103 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191381036934 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561426844475 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505998376555 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124433317602 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030177002127 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.