automobiles destroyed the quality of our life
The invention of automobiles was one the biggest invents during all ages. When the first automobile invented, people taught it is probably the best thing human has invented till now. But, were automobiles that much good? in my view, the answer is no. no matter how much automobiles made the life easier, they made some bad effects which can even let us to count the automobile as one of the bad things humans has invented.
Firstly, Automobiles are one of the main sources of pollution. Each time we turn the television or radio on, we hear about pollution. No matter where you live, pollution; specially air pollution is the thing you have to struggle with. Nowadays is has proved that automobiles are one of the main sources of pollution. However, all automobile factories are doing their best to decrease the level of harmful gasses which automobiles produce, but, they are still really harmful for the earth. We have so many big factories which release tones of greenhouse gases each day, but because they are big and completely obvious, we assume them as the main reason of pollutions. But, because automobiles are not as big as factories, we may sometimes ignore the effect of them on pollutions. In my view, the effects of automobiles in a city can be even much more than a big factory. Why so, an automobile produces all kind of pollutions and the clearest pollutions they make are noise and air pollution.
Secondly, automobiles lead to death of so many people. Automobiles made some good effects on our life, which we much appreciate for these good effect. But, beside all good effects automobiles had on our life, they increased the rate of death so much. Just last month I saw a big car crush right in front of my university. This car crush leaded to death of three young girls. In my view, if there be just one reason which forces us to not use automobiles any more, it will be the effect of automobiles on the death of so many young people. These car crushes and their emotional results can truly decrease the quality of our life. Me, personally, cannot forget all bad senses I have seen in car crushes and sometimes these things make life really hard for me. I am sure it is true for others as well
To cut the long story short, all I want to say is that, we must thank all people who worked really hard on automobiles and could make the life much easier for us. But, beside all good effects of automobiles on our life, we can count them as one the factors which destroyed the quality of our life. They destroyed our planet, killed so many people and made so deep and bad memories for us.
- smoking 73
- Anting in birds and some possible benefits of it. 73
- establishing colonies and traveling to Asteroids and some problems of that 73
- AGREE OR DISSAGREE?CHILDREN SHOULD NOT HAVE TO WORK OR HELP WITH HOUSEHOLD TASKS; THEIR ONLY RESPONSIBILITY SHOULD BE TO STUDY. 70
- The text is discussing salvage logging which defines it as a way we aim to deal with dead trees and remove them and provides three reasons of support. The professor goes against all of the explained reasons and tells us why she is against the text. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
.... But, were automobiles that much good? in my view, the answer is no. no matter ho...
^^
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...y view, the answer is no. no matter how much automobiles made the life easier, they ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, well, kind of, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57569296375 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47988255118 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.454157782516 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 687.6 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3393250942 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.84 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.76 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334011149945 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101445849841 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10995780717 0.0737576698707 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230525378928 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109434825901 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.