birds and buildings
The reading claims that every day, millions of birds are damaged by buildings glasses because they can not distinguish glasses as barriers. Hence, the reading provides some solutions, but the lecturer finds all them dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author argues that buildings glasses can be replaced by one-way glasses. these glasses are not transparent in both directions. As a result, birds can conceive them as a obstacle, and they will not try to get through them. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that these one-way glasses act like mirrors , thereby reflecting the sky or trees in the street. Hence, birds will become confused, and they will try to pass from the glasses again.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that architects can paint colorful strips and lines on ordinary window glasses to disturb birds from the building because they avoid going to fly through the painted glasses. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that unpainted openings are perceived as holes by birds, which encourage them to fly through unpainted spots. Besides, if they make holes smaller, rooms get darker in the building.
Finally, the reading asserts that artificial magnetic fields can conduct birds away from the building since they have an innate ability to recognize earth's magnetic field to find their right path. But the lecturer argues that birds only use their diagnostic ability when migrate long distances and not short ones, which are from one side of a city to another side. Therefore, making an artificial magnetic field is useless because birds can not realize it.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally One cannot learn how to develop it 76
- why do people travel 60
- You have long been friends with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 76
- A university has money in its budget to do one thing to improve its facilities for students It can either improve the quality of the technology for example computers and printers that it provides for students or it can redesign spaces where students hold 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause they can not distinguish glasses as barriers. Hence, the reading provides so...
^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ses can be replaced by one-way glasses. these glasses are not transparent in both dir...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...As a result, birds can conceive them as a obstacle, and they will not try to get ...
^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t these one-way glasses act like mirrors , thereby reflecting the sky or trees in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 268.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16791044776 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41516699328 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570895522388 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3675983142 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.538461538 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260913646803 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917047217413 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832153869411 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16604817126 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321477730161 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.