businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree?
The legislation of employing staff is a controversial issue among businesses. Some people believe that companies should hire employees until their retired ages. They believe that it helps employees to focus strongly on their jobs without concerning about losing their position on their work, and also it provides them to make long-term plans for their lives due to their stable and permanent jobs. While, other people disagree with hiring employees for their whole lives, they believe companies need young and refreshed workforce to increase their efficiency. Personally, I agree with the latter idea. I believe that benefits of hiring workers for a long time are outweighed by their drawbacks. In what follows, I will cogently pinpoint my most conspicuous reasons to support my point of view.
To begin with, if companies guarantee to hire workers for their entire lives, although workers have no stress about losing their jobs, but it cause to reduce competition between them and the innovation, enterprise and creativity of employees are faded away, the employees don't try their best because they assure that they don't lose their jobs anyway, therefore it effect on companies efficiency. While, if they have temporary jobs, they compete to each other to stay longer at their jobs, so it is definitely beneficial for companies.
Furthermore, it is not possible for companies that always employ workers for whole of their life, sometimes companies projects take long just for specific years, for example five or six years so companies don't need employees anymore and they have to fire their employees after the projects are accomplished.
Finally, because of competition among companies, businesses need young staff who have strong incentive to reach the pinnacle of their jobs and are diligent individuals. While, most of aged people are often satisfied with their current positions and don't try to culminate the peak of their jobs. So companies have to rehire their former staff at least every 5 years.
To make a long story short, although hiring employee for long turn bring some benefits for employees but it has some disadvantages for companies and businesses. Companies need young employee to enhance their productivity. All aforementioned reasons point to my idea. However, an important issue that must be mentioned is that this cannot be used as a prescription for companies and some counter examples might exist.
- tpo27_writing_Q1 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should assign homework for students every dayBut the big argument among teachers is that how much homework is enough for students? do they do assignment every day? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents do not understand their children as much as well as did 50 years ago. (rewrite) 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The purpose of television is to educate, not to entertain. 76
- Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or shouldgovernments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)?Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 143, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
... stress about losing their jobs, but it cause to reduce competition between them and ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reducing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: reducing
...s about losing their jobs, but it cause to reduce competition between them and the innova...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 273, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...employees are faded away, the employees dont try their best because they assure that...
^^^^
Line 2, column 323, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...heir best because they assure that they dont lose their jobs anyway, therefore it ef...
^^^^
Line 2, column 365, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effects'?
Suggestion: effects
...nt lose their jobs anyway, therefore it effect on companies efficiency. While, if they...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 375, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...eir jobs anyway, therefore it effect on companies efficiency. While, if they have tempora...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 535, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is definitely beneficial for companies. Furthermore, it is not possible for comp...
^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... example five or six years so companies dont need employees anymore and they have t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ompanies dont need employees anymore and they have to fire their employees after ...
^^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...isfied with their current positions and dont try to culminate the peak of their jobs...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, at least, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2042.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26288659794 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70746655985 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510309278351 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.6994249767 48.9658058833 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.117647059 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8235294118 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335893216606 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111113684651 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836428640184 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192403892694 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068429779788 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.