A company is going to give some money either to support the arts or to protect the environment. Which do you think the company should choose? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
At the turn of the new century, with the development of human modern society, people more and more tend to build their societies. Actually, people’s attitudes toward this issue are varied from person to person. Although some people are in conviction that allocating some money to support art leads to protect their culture, I believe spending some money to support environment due to healthier life and informing people about impact of their activities on nature.
The first aspect to point out is that what provokes people to spend some money to develop environment is having healthier life. In fact, as time marches on, air pollution has become a major problem in most megacities as it continues to pose a potential threat on people’s health. Take a case of old person or a patient who has respiratory problem for instance. Not only does it damage their immune systems, but also it limits their daily activities especially in winter when the pollutants in the weather are intensified, so undoubtedly a detailed and careful plan and a large annual budget are needed to reducing air pollution and its adverse effects on environment and human. There are several ways to encounter with this major problem; for example, renewal energy should be substituted for burning fossil fuels which causes a large amount of harmful gases. Also, a group of scientists have recently reached a technology for producing a fuel from the waste of animals, which is less harmful but more expensive to manufacture. Hence, this money can be given to one of these research teams to complete their researches and even produce some quantity of these fuels.
A further more subtle point is that a large amount of money is required to warn people about their activities. It is noteworthy that, the environment is devastated in recent decades by human activities such as deforesting. Many people are unaware that they are jeopardizing their natural surroundings by their activities and if they are notified about that, they will stop them. Therefore, a large amount of money should spend for advertising about the harmful effects of cutting forest’s trees and broadcast through mass media. Moreover, training programs should be provided in order to teach people how they can extend green environment and how they can plant trees. It is essential People know they should maintain the balance of ecosystem since, trees, plant life, and people all depend on each other. An unhealthy environment can have harmful effects on the ecosystem. For example, if a plant dies because of changes to the environment and that plant is food for an animal, that animal will not have any food. If humans use that animal as a food source, it leads to big problem.
On the whole, according to the above-mentioned points and details, it is crystal-clear that the company should invest to environment issues including reducing air pollution as well as inform community about catastrophic events that may happen as a result of their activities. It is high time we stopped overlooking the fact that without enough invest people can extend green environment. It is anticipated, if companies do not allocate money to environment’s plans, next generation will confront with critical situations.
- integrated 46 63
- It is more important to read and watch news presented by people whose opinion is different from your own view than by people whose opinion are similar to yours 85
- To be a successful person one must be open to new ideas and willing to change his or her mind 83
- do you agree or disagree?politicians should have strong social skills in order to become successful? 86
- integrated 46 63
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in fact', 'such as', 'as a result', 'as well as', 'on the whole']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255852842809 0.229887763892 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.158862876254 0.158761421928 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0886287625418 0.0866891130778 102% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0351170568562 0.046263068375 76% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0484949832776 0.0685040099705 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122073578595 0.118717715034 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0434782608696 0.0351676179071 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84749603816 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0367892976589 0.0309702414327 119% => OK
Particles: 0.00167224080268 0.00188951952338 89% => OK
Determiners: 0.0836120401338 0.0887237588012 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0234113712375 0.0209618222197 112% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0133779264214 0.0139019557991 96% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3260.0 2387.08602151 137% => OK
No of words: 533.0 408.028673835 131% => OK
Chars per words: 6.11632270169 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.48200974243 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.390243902439 0.338922669872 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266416510319 0.251872472559 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.189493433396 0.174417080927 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.135084427767 0.112833075102 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84749603816 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 212.727598566 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525328330206 0.524397521467 100% => OK
Word variations: 64.3246185701 59.2087087015 109% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.2272727273 20.5533526081 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7037711319 48.84282405 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.181818182 120.699889404 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2272727273 20.5533526081 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.863636363636 0.644075263715 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 50.8689237592 45.7405998639 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.73793103448 1.45489161554 119% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364806655558 0.300154397459 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.121413995432 0.103427244359 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.084181198257 0.0752933317313 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.443603504389 0.497263757937 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124100648165 0.151897553556 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130875388357 0.114077575197 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816139377671 0.0781384742642 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.424741905139 0.336927656856 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0183071701319 0.067059652881 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276893485643 0.210909579961 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505676718404 0.0618886996521 82% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8870967742 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.86379928315 388% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.91756272401 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 8.42114695341 24% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 13.0 2.4623655914 528% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.6433691756 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.