Compare and contrast your way of life with that of your parents. Which way of life do you think would be more satisfied to future generation?
The question is whether our parent’s life would be more appropriate to next generation or the way that we, ourselves, have applied for our life. Everyone with regard to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this issue; however I believe that our own approach will be more adequate for future children. I feel some reasons, which I explore them in the following essay and they will be able to strengthen my vantage point:
To begin with, nobody could overlook the fact that nowadays harsh circumstance of economics has been changed the world; hence its effects on the society and people's life is an undeniable reality. The epitome of this is in the past, the families were self- sufficient. As a matter a fact, the products such as food, vegetable, cloth and so on, were being produced at home. Since communities had not evolved in economics troubles, just one of member of family was responsible for financial issues. And then abruptly all things altered. Populous families superseded with thin households because the world confront the inflation and fiscal problems and lack of natural resource. These days, whether the young or old have to work for a long time, and since there is no enough time for cooking, tailoring, repairing and list goes on ; as a result, human being do not waste any time for learning such these types of activities. Current generation has grown up in this condition and one should not forget that as time is gone (?) the young people look for more convenient compared with previous generation.
The second reason for my argument lies the fact of technology. It goes without saying that technology plays a vital role in our life in spread spectrum. Saving- time in such a world which requires to be up-date, is a noticeable factor. To elucidate, take students as an example who study in far universities. It cannot be denied that online- courses have caused students to stay at home and their city; consequently, they will be able to spend extra time for more entertainments or miscellaneous classes. By the same token it works about shopping, ordering food, reserving seat on the airplane just with a click of mouse. One should notice that technology keeps marching forward; therefore, a great number of inventions will be invented in the future. Whether good or bad, we should accept this reality that the main goal of technology is the creation of more welfare for people, so next people will adapt to this style of life even more than us.
As I have illustrated, this conclusion could be drawn that there are the big differences between our life and our parents. Each one has particular features; however in my opinion the present life could be more helpful or better satisfied for our children
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-05-06 | peerless alex | 90 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 84
- TPO35 3
- do you agree or disagree? teachers have to require homework from students ever day 83
- tpo31 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1021, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...hould not forget that as time is gone ? the young people look for more convenient c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, look, second, so, then, therefore, i feel, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, with regard to, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2294.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89125799574 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65458675471 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584221748401 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.0137609714 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.238095238 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214851975693 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575488359504 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593881415621 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144090959515 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504322969002 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.