Consider a situation where you are asked by your supervisor to work with one of your co-workers on a project. This co-worker has opinions that are very different from yours and they feel very strongly about these opinions. Do you think this is a good idea? Use reasons and examples to support your answer.
Working with a partner is amazing because as a team there are more ideas as compared to individual. It is important to have a co-worker with in all project but that person must have some similar views so, it will become easy to work. All people have their own thoughts and if you stuck in a situation that you have to work with a person who is different it can be deadly. In my view it is not a good idea. In the following essay I intend to put forth my points and reasons to support.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that, if 2 people have different views, they never get a good bonding and team works needs bonding for successful projects otherwise both wants that their idea should be apply. For instance, few months back I worked in a company where one of my co-workers always put forward his points and wants us to follow it and unfortunately I was asked to do work with him, as we do not have any replacement. In addition, we decide that I ll make presentation and he will do research work. As a result, I gave my hours for that assignment and he told me that I did it wrong just because he do not like it, he wants me to do it by his style which was not possible and we lost a deal just beacause we did not complete it on time. Therefore, this example illustrates that do distinct people can never work together.
Second, having a group members who only like their ideas, working with such individuals is so difficult because I do not feel good to work with them. For instance, when I was doing my internship program for credits hours this senario happened to me by putting away my ego and my ideas my thoughts I decided that I will do that project but it was like a burden to me only because of my co-worker and I did not get the chance to enjoy that interesting project. Thus, this instance ellaborates that you can never enjoy the work with this type of worker.
In conclusion, to have a different views is not bad but you must listen to others to and try to do it mutually.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-24 | Tina-Poorbaghi | 85 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | nida fatima | 60 | view |
| 2021-08-05 | ursula | 66 | view |
| 2021-03-26 | edsonsimoes | 66 | view |
| 2020-08-08 | GHAZAL100 | 85 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In my country young people have a better life today than their parents enjoyed when they were young Use reasons and examples to support your answer 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'applied'?
Suggestion: applied
...se both wants that their idea should be apply. For instance, few months back I worked...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 624, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
... me that I did it wrong just because he do not like it, he wants me to do it by hi...
^^
Line 2, column 805, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...refore, this example illustrates that do distinct people can never work together....
^^
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n never work together. Second, having a group members who only like their ideas,...
^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'member'?
Suggestion: member
...work together. Second, having a group members who only like their ideas, working with...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., when I was doing my internship program for credits hours this senario happened ...
^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...interesting project. Thus, this instance ellaborates that you can never enjoy the...
^^
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'view'?
Suggestion: view
...er. In conclusion, to have a different views is not bad but you must listen to other...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ust listen to others to and try to do it mutually.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 43.0788530466 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.22454308094 4.8611393121 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46293135397 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477806788512 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5116070947 48.9658058833 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.571428571 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3571428571 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237789951064 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951901920255 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550912852014 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152822437689 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426131925079 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.49 10.9000537634 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.