Consider a situation where you are asked by your supervisor to work with one of your coworkers on a project This coworker has opinions that are very different from yours and they feel very strongly about these opinions Do you think this is a good idea Use

Essay topics:

Consider a situation where you are asked by your supervisor to work with one of your coworkers on a project. This coworker has opinions that are very different from yours and they feel very strongly about these opinions. Do you think this is a good idea? Use reasons and examples to support your answer.

It is significant to respect others opinions even though the idea is opposed to a person’s idea. In my opinion, it is efficient to work on assignments with people who have completely non-identical ideas. I feel this way for three main reasons which I will investigate in the following essay.

To begin with, people can expand their perspective and come up with unique ideas by listening to someone who has an opposite idea. There is a probability that a person will come up with unexpected breakthroughs after listening to an opposite idea. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When my class was debating whether we should be required to wear a mask or not, my opinion was that even though a mask is annoying especially in the summer since the temperature is high, a mask is a valuable way to protect ourselves. On the other hand, some said that if we all take off the mask and get COVID at the same time, the pandemic will be over. I have never thought about this perspective, but it made me consider this problem again because of the opposite idea from mine.

On top of that, it is a valuable encounter to ameliorate their communication expertise by communicating with coworkers. In this case, it requires a person to talk clearly to convince one's own opinions since coworkers have opposite ideas. For instance, we debated whether we should wear school uniforms on the regular day at school or not. My proposition was that students can wear uniforms if they want, and school should not require students to wear uniforms every single day. On the other hand, some people protest that school uniforms keep students focused on their education. It provides equivalents, and people will not judge people by their clothes. Nevertheless, I queried how school uniforms affect their education since there is no evidence that belongs to it. Since this debate, my communication ability went satisfactory because I grasped how to deal with opposing ideas.

In conclusion, working with coworkers who have an opposite idea can be an advantageous experience because people can amplify their perspectives and it allows them to improve their communications ability.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-10-15 hellohello202215 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user hellohello202215 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is significant to respect others opin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... investigate in the following essay. To begin with, people can expand their p...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one who has an opposite idea. There is a probability that a person will come up w...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause of the opposite idea from mine. On top of that, it is a valuable encount...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed how to deal with opposing ideas. In conclusion, working with coworkers wh...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97808219178 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87105248832 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517808219178 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.165283517 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.944444444 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2777777778 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140515865471 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504529496939 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474175688487 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980488504096 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334618133806 0.0645574589148 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.