It is tempting to think that working for busniess owned by one's familiy is a previlege since all profits go directly into the familiy's pocket. Nevertheless, from my perspective, it is better to work for business of someone else rather than devote one's energy to his or her family business.
On the one hand, the most significant problem of family owned business is that it is hard to supervise. In most cases, family memebers not only share ownership of their company or store, but also particiate in the daily management of their business. Considering the emomtinal bond between these manager, who are all relatives to each other, it is difficult to get rid of personal feelings and make rational decisions for the company. My mother, for example, once invested in a factory along with my uncle. She worked delicately to win bids for the factory and my uncle was in charge of runing the factory. With huge investment in money and time, my mother earned the factory considerable orders. However, their business was never profitiable. It turns out that my uncle stealed from the fundind of the factory. If he were not a relative, my mother would have sued him for stealing. In the end, she merely withdrawed her money and there was no punishment for my uncle's wrong doing.
On the other hand, working in family business will limite one's choise of career. Unlike looking for a job in labor market, where people could pick the companies that thay are interested in, in which field will the family opperate is often not up to a single person. Sadly, people may not like what their family are making a living with. For instance, a friend of mine comes from a family that sell high-end watch for severl generations. Unfortunately, the only hobby of friend is music, and he would rather be a poor muscian than to run his family business. Forcing him to work for the family is amount to destory his dream.
Addmitedly, the motivation for working for family busniess could be surficiant as people are eventually working for themselves. Nonetheless, tools such as stock option have samiliar functions, which encouraging people to work harder in busniess owned by someone else.
As a result, the benefits of working in companies owned by others bypass these of running a family business becasue family business are often harder to supervise, and people have little choose of their career if they decide to work for their family.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Some people prefer to buy technological devices as soon as they are available to the public. Others people prefer to wait until many people have used them. Which do you prefer? 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One can learn a lot about a person from the type of friends this person has. 73
- Do you agree or disagree: In order to succeed in study or job，the ability to adjust or adapt to changing condition or circumstance is more important than having knowledge. 88
- Your teacher assigns a project to you, and you can select the members to work with.1) choose the members who think and work in similar ways. 2) choose the members who have totally different ideas. Which would you think is more effective to work with? 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...familiy is a previlege since all profits go directly into the familiys pocket. Ne...
^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ness of someone else rather than devote ones energy to his or her family business. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this manager' or 'these managers'?
Suggestion: this manager; these managers
... Considering the emomtinal bond between these manager, who are all relatives to each other, i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2015.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85542168675 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57984865892 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527710843373 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3085322248 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9523809524 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7619047619 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.45110844103 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435974605543 0.236089414692 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130675028503 0.076458572812 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10783878295 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291877949496 0.150856017488 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795427138388 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.