Do you agree or diagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, iuniversities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
I agree with the statement that university professors should be paid higher to improve the quality of education.
Teaching is considered to be a noble profession. They are considered as leaders who pave the way to the future. The salaries are pretty low as compared to other professions and should be increased for the following reasons.
Firstly, under the spell of the profession being a noble deed, the teachers are not able to meet up with the day to day expenditure, owing to the low income. The pressure thus added, leads to a deduction in the zest and interest while teaching. The knowledge imparted is not complete. For example, many of the good school teachers who have been in the profession for a long time are quitting their jobs, since the rate at which the market grows and the rate of their increment in salary does not match. An increment in their salary would provide a good incentive for them teach in a better way, such that the purpose is fulfilled.
Secondly, due to the low salary structure, the youth is not motivated into teaching. Therefore, the young minds which are so full of knowledge and bright ideas are not being used for the progress of the coming generations. The give and take relationship of information is getting limited. The only lot of teachers that we see now are mostly people who had no other option and fell prey to the standards set. Thus, by the increase in salary, more people of the new generation would be keen on taking up this profession and spread their knowledge to others. The youth is well acquainted with the new technology and those techniques could aid the learning process.
Thirdly, when the university loosens the fist and is willing to pay the professors well, visiting professors would be ready to come and share their work. For example, in architecture, practicing architects could visit the universities to explain how the profession works in real life, what kind of complexities one would have to face. Such experiences are great eye openers and also generate interest in students, giving them a break from their daily schedule.
To conclude, teaching is a job which requires a lot of patience and dedication therefore, to keep this alive, the professors need to happy and peaceful. One of the major criteria to achieve this is economic stability, hence a raise in the income is necessary.
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Usespecific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- how does writing impact today s world 100
- Some people prefer to work for a large company. Others prefer to work for a small company. Which would you prefer? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers. 83
- Do you agree or diagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, iuniversities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 342, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
... of teachers that we see now are mostly people who had no other option and fell prey t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85432098765 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70508899626 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540740740741 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8753632464 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132427482135 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038669955503 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068487143124 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904070420911 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987769304767 0.0645574589148 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.