Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
According to me, the television advertising directed towards children aged between two to five should be allowed.
Television has reached every single persons house, be it a person from an economically lower background or a person from a wealthy family, everybody watches or comes across some amount television in the day.
The advertising agencies have taken this fact to their advantage by tieing up with major companies and brands for promotion of their products. One such category of advertising is for products related to children.
Firstly, the reason why advertisements are benefiting the public is that parents with young children, become aware of what the industry is producing. The various products coming up in the market provide a wide range to choose from, based on the particular need. For example, protein powders to be added in milk have different constituents and in different proportions. Not all children are susceptible to digest all the contents, thus due to the advertisement, the parents become acquainted with the product, specific to what will suit their child. Doctors are also finding it easy to refer a specific thing by referencing it to the advertisement. This bridges the gap between the doctor and parent of the child.
Moreover, children are glued to the television set and the content seen by them is influential. When the kids watch the advertisements on television, it motivates them to use it or try it out. The product can be a medicine or calcium tablets etc.
The flowery images and scenes mould their minds in a way that the parents don't have to be behind their child for its consumption. The children readily take it without creating a fuss.
Although, the advertisements are doing a proactive task, there can be some shortcomings. Not all advertisements are regarding the growth or betterment of the children, some of them are marketing toys an chocolates that is commodities which are not necessary. As mentioned before the kids are exposed to the media through television, they then tend to ask for this kind of stuff. For some parents, its easy to fulfill their kids needs without thinking twice about the expenditure, but for the people who cannot afford it easily, they tend to flounder around.
Usually this ends up with a deprived child or an exploited parent.
To conclude, I am of the conviction that a strong aid like media should take its position seriously and its job more responsiblity. television is watched on a global scale, hence the impact it creates is also humongous. Proper care and thought must be put by the advertising agencies towards what content they telecast, especially about the children.
By doing so, the affinity thriving among the masses about television will be advantageous and pioneering.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | Udari | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | kangyan | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | cristina.nichiforov | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | cristina.nichiforov | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | MattNewhouse96 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the spcific solutions presented in the reading passage. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades (marks) encourage students to learn. Usespecific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 90
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt onspecific points made in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
According to me, the television advertising directed to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 75, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d their minds in a way that the parents dont have to be behind their child for its c...
^^^^
Line 10, column 201, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ildren, some of them are marketing toys an chocolates that is commodities which ar...
^^
Line 10, column 201, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an chocolate' or simply 'chocolates'?
Suggestion: an chocolate; chocolates
...ildren, some of them are marketing toys an chocolates that is commodities which are not neces...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 133, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Television
...riously and its job more responsiblity. television is watched on a global scale, hence the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, thus, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2330.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09846827133 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92585623655 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53829321663 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6052943661 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0833333333 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0416666667 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95833333333 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.53405017921 221% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23346171302 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657614774882 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827062513829 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10869384623 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106749953392 0.0645574589148 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.