do you agree or disagree? the ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make new friends easily.
The question is whether the ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make new friends easily or not. Everyone in consideration to cons and pros of this issue can maintain a specific direction toward this question; however I am willing to refute it. In my perspective, making new friends in different situations is able to bring a lot of advantages and this can lead us toward pleasure.
My arguments and reasons are listed below which will strengthen my point of view:
To begin with; it is axiomatic that old friends play a crucial role in our life, because we have spent a long time with them during years and there is a strong connection between us; however it is an undeniable fact that such old friends will not be able to provide fresh and new experiences for us. The world has been changing and people need to keep up with it; consequently getting familiar with other persons will give a chance to us for obtaining worthwhile experiences which help us to have a satisfied feeling about ourselves. Such a great feeling is the most important factor of being happy.
The second reason why I disagree with this statement lies the fact that new relationships will cause people to try for various types of excitements and entertainments. For instance, last year I could get familiar with someone who had a special personality. One day she decided to travel to Roma. In an effort, she could convince me to accompany her in this trip. My old friends were not inclined to visit the ancient cities, in fact their preference was modern cities; subsequently this was a big opportunity for me. After visiting Roma, I made a decision to study in archaeology field for master degree and needless to say that my new friend's idea pushed me toward a huge prosperity.
Moreover, the old friends have been selected based on their honesty, loyalty and kindness; hence having more such friends has worth to take risk and make new friends. If we are enough mature, so it will not be hard to choose right person.
As I have illustrated, I strongly believe that knowing more people is kind of challenge to do risk and one should not forget that taking risk is related with excitement and it goes without saying that having excitement in the life can make us away from lethargy and numb feeling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...he ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...th a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to right'
Suggestion: to right
...ature, so it will not be hard to choose right person. As I have illustrated, I str...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, while, for instance, in fact, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70405727924 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6452442556 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568019093079 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.6706766011 48.9658058833 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.4 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9333333333 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312573746384 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100304396695 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168163320577 0.0737576698707 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137749656543 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128085702714 0.0645574589148 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.