Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Currently, increasing people starts to worry about lacking of happiness because of overwhelming pressure from their works and study. A glance at people's attitude towards happiness brings to the light question, namely, whether the ability to make new friends or maintain friendships for a long time contribute more to happiness. If I were forced to choose, I insist that maintaining friendships with a few people over a long period is more important for happiness. And I will elaborate on my reasons in the following essay.
Admittedly, making new friends might also contribute to happiness. But after making new friends, people often need to distinct whether their new friends are good person. And it might prevent people from happiness if their new friends are bad guys.
The first reason worth mentioning is that for children, a small group of people are who they are the most familiar with, and these people will surely provide children with great happiness. To be more specific, a small group of friends are always a groups of people who know each other a lot. And since every child in the group knows the hobbies and personalities of other children in the groups, they would obviously know the optimal ways to make other children happy. I have known some of my friends at an early age. Since we all know each other, even though we do not communicate frequently recently, we would still feel pleasant when we chat with each other on the Internet.
Moreover, for adults on the other hands, a small group of people would probably provide them with necessary aids in their daily life, which is essential for happiness. This is because nowadays, many people are under overwhelming pressure from their work, as a result, some aids would help people to finish their assignments quickly and offer them with more time to be happy. For example, my father is a leader of a group in a company. The co-workers in the groups are not only his assistants, but his good friends. My father used to told me that the reason why he could often be with me is that these people often help him with his work without any requirements. Without the helps from his friends, my father would likely to endure much more pressure from his work and have no time to stay with me and have fun.
In conclusion, drawing upon from what have been mentioned above, I strongly advocate that the ability to maintain friendships with a few people over a long period is more important for happiness. This is because the friendship among small groups of people would benefit people from all ages. And with these benefit, people are more likely to be happy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a group' or simply 'groups'?
Suggestion: a group; groups
...ic, a small group of friends are always a groups of people who know each other a lot. An...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, still, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79515418502 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50015912863 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45154185022 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5526281521 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.619047619 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.80952380952 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343527748988 0.236089414692 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112677651419 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848866866014 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219162627567 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0936524061534 0.0645574589148 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.