Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? 8
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, people spend a myriad of time at work and in order to enjoy it we should think of which schedule is better for us. Personally, I prefer to work long hours just three days a week rather than short hours five days a week. There are a few reasons for that.
First of all, this kind of schedule benefits my relationships with family and friends. Working five days a week can be overwhelming. A person who works this way has to wake up early every morning and when he or she comes back home in the evening, he or she wants nothing but to lay down and relax. On the other hand, if people have four days off weekly, they have enough time to sleep and recover. This provides them with a lot of energy to communicate with others. My own experience is a compelling example of this. I am a pharmacy technician and work twelve hours shift three days a week and I love it because during my time off I can play with my children and take them out to different museums and entertaining shows. It brings us closer and helps us to build a meaningful connection. Moreover, I have plenty of free time to visit my friends and relatives and participate in their lives. This is one of the reasons why I prefer this schedule.
Secondly, when people work just a few days a week, they save money on commuting. Gas is quite expensive these days and if an individual has to drive to work almost every day, his expenses on fuel are tremendous, especially if his office is a long distance from his house or apartments. For instance, when I was living in a big city, my employer wanted me to be at work five days a week. Unfortunately, at that time it was the only available job opportunity for me, so I had to follow the request. In this way, I spent over two hundreds dollars a month on gas. However, with my current employment, which I mentioned above, I was able to reduce the expenses dramatically and afford to buy a new vehicle. This example illustrates my point of view.
To conclude, I believe that it is better to work long hours just a few days a week. This is because it helps us to develop our relationships with those who we value the most, and benefits us financially.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory near your community. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this new influence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory? Explain your position. 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- Some people want to work for a large company, others choose to work for a small one. Which one do you prefer? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use that there are now.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34236453202 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6018061102 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527093596059 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8756928323 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1363636364 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286318727796 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867759506394 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799630878148 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19480995631 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655275354222 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.89 10.9000537634 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.