Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? the ability to maintain a friendship with a small number of people over a long period is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
According to the intrinsic feature of mankind which makes him a social individual, making a friend has a fundamental role in people's life. The prompt has questioned whether it is continuing with the identical small friend group is effective in people's happiness or making a novel and more friends. In my perspective, possessing the same tiny friendship is more effective in human being's happiness. In what follows, I would list most conspicuous reasons which give adherence to my standpoint.
The first striking reason which should be mentioned is the possibility of having a conflict with old friends is fewer than the new ones. In another word, as two individuals spend a prolonged duration together, during which they get familiar with each other's behavior, the disagreement points between them are declined. This fact is also verified by the noteworthy, intelligent study conducted in the Psychology Department of the Tehran University in Iran. According to this research, the possibility of disagreement and conflict among two persons decreases by approximate thirty-five percent pre each year that they spend with together. Indeed, during years two person get used to each other's feature and are aware of which action causes happiness and upset of his partner. Furthermore, it is obvious that there is a cogent connection between happiness and fewer conflicts. Thus, small old friendship guarantees happiness.
Another equally crucial reason which should be considered is the continuity of old friendship is time-saving. In fact, is it possible to call a person, who you have met her in fifteen minutes, as your best friend? The establishment of any novel interaction with a stranger is time-consuming since both sides have to introduce themselves to each other, to get required trust for forming a deep and trustworthy relationship. A lucid example which shed the spotlight on this reason is my experiences during the 4th grade of my high school. During that period, I had a very tough program which covers many courses; in addition, I was a stranger in that school. Consequently, while I had to concentrate on my courses, I also had to make new friends. But it was an arduous task, since the period of getting to know each other was as long as a month, and it disturbed my attention from my lessons and upsets me. Thus, as you can save your time by interacted well-known friends you save your time and have sufficient period for your stuff.
However, some groups assert that interaction with new people is required for the human being since the repetition can be boring. Although this claim can seem sound in the first glance, it lacks in a subtle point. Continuing the old friendship does not prevent the making of new friends. The crucial point is to select the right person, and this novel relation does not affect the old one. Since a Persian idiom says, everyone can make new friend, the main chores are to continue your old friendship. By the consideration of above-mentioned reasons, the importance of the old relationship is so crucial which should not be destroyed.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons, explicitly illustrate that the human being requires to pursued his old relation to be happy. As by this continuity, there are fewer struggles, it saves time for other joyful tasks; in addition, continuing the old friendship does not affect making novel ones.
- Do agree or disagree. One news source is a sufficient to get aware of every thing? 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?A job with more vacation time but low salary is better than a job with a high salary but less vacation. 77
- Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People will spend less time cooking and preparing food in twenty years. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 381, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...y friendship is more effective in human beings happiness. In what follows, I would lis...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which give adherence to my standpoint. The first striking reason which should b...
^^^^
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...uring which they get familiar with each others behavior, the disagreement points betwe...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 666, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...with together. Indeed, during years two person get used to each others feature and are...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... old friendship guarantees happiness. Another equally crucial reason which sho...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ave sufficient period for your stuff. However, some groups assert that interac...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crucial which should not be destroyed. To wrap it up, all the aforementioned re...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2867.0 1977.66487455 145% => OK
No of words: 561.0 407.700716846 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11051693405 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98575943804 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502673796791 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 850.5 618.680645161 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.94265232975 303% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5354290166 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.269230769 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5769230769 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88461538462 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1941139451 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560963624195 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506250704403 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11214828288 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425210540581 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 86.8835125448 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.