1. Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The author propounds that society should provide specified training system for the identified talents students until exploring their talents in the early ages. This is the claim with which I generally do concur. Among the countless rearing facts about my perspective, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs, to verify my standpoint.
The first striking fact is the difference in the ability of two groups of the talented and ordinary student which can interrupt the teaching process. Indeed, according to the variation of talent types and advantageous given to each student, the speed of learning by each pupil in various field of studies differs. For instance, while a prepared student in the mathematics learns whole formulas and their implementation very fast and in one try, there are the requirements of repetition of same topic over and over for an ordinary student who is not apt in math. This variation of learning speed can interrupt the teaching too if the teacher wishes to keep on the speed of learning by talent students, the other pupil will not get chase content of the lessons; thus, majority of the class will fail in math. On the other hand, if the teaching speed was aligned with the learning velocity of ordinary students, the talented ones would get bored. Therefore, the preparation of a different training environment according to the student’s talent causes to have more proficient classes.
The second equal crux point which should be considered is the advantages of this clarification and separation of the students based on their talents over the subjects. It is obvious that while a pupil is prepared in a field, he possesses the failure in another area. This identification and clarification by society give the self-esteem and self-confidence to the students, which if they are not good in a subject, they are decent another one. Thus, the advantageous because of talent can be replaced with his failure in the other fields. Besides, this awareness helps them to get eagerness toward learning the area at which they are not good; since his success in the talented subject encourage him for examination and working on his failure too.
Finally, this early stage identification is profitable for the government. Actually, annually millions of dollars are allocated as the budget for the educational systems which does not have a lucid picture from its effect on the students’ future life. This ambiguity is for the sake of lacking the exact clarification spends’ areas and guidance of the finance on them. However, if the money was spent according to the talent of students and their flourishment, the warranty of success of students is so high. In this scenario, all the current expanse on the education system will lead to the profit in the future as the well-educated, talented, and professional graduated student have been occupied in different jobs. For instance, based on the yearly census of Iran budget, the government allocates $2 milliard for the education, which does have no guarantee on its profit in the future. Otherwise, this clarification increases the chance of profit in the future.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned facts explicitly depict the validity of identification of talent and rearing the students according their talents, since it eases the teaching system at the school, is beneficial for students’ self-esteem; furthermore, it warranties the specialists will be occupied in job in the future and the governor will get its all expenses as the profit from their occupation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | jha | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | skjasharif | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | adnan_3082 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | mussob34 | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | mussob34 | 58 | view |
- tpo40.1 80
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 62
- 31.As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 83
- tpo23 70
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... self-confidence to the students, which if they are not good in a subject, they ar...
^^
Line 4, column 810, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of Iran budget, the government allocates milliard for the education, which does h...
^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...in the future and the governor will get its all expenses as the profit from their o...
^^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es as the profit from their occupation.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3010.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 582.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17182130584 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91168771031 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98336812192 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463917525773 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 933.3 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.7774882237 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.818181818 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189196870653 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619508145242 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501132334317 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117412642171 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039081104372 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 100.480337079 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.