Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The advice from the grandparents is of no use to their grandchildren because the world has changed a lot over the past 50 years.
Advice, as we all know, for the majority of people, is the most crucial part of their life. Although it may seem exaggerated, at first sight, one may find debating about advice sensible. In this regard, many people support this opinion that the advice from grandparents is of no use for their next-generation since over 5o years the world has changed. I believe that these advises are not practical anymore because of the modern era and the primitive nature of their advice. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold this belief that nowadays, we deter using grandparents’ advice because of the modern era. Undoubtedly, we live in a modern age, and life has been changed, as well. These changes cause people facing problems that had never existed before. Therefore, obviously, there is no solution invented for current issues. Although critics may debate that we are human beings and using the past generation's advice will be useful, the majority of people ignore that kind of help. Based on an experiment that has been conducted recently, results showed that many people try to trust their solutions and experiences rather than use their grandparents’ advice because they think life basically has influenced by the modern era, and some kinds of issues have not existed before.
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is the primitive aspect of advice. Although still there are many fields that we can use the previous generation experiences in it, intrinsically, in many aspects, there are out of use. Because, in comparison to the present lifestyle, grandparents had lived in the more straightforward circumstances that made them think much simpler than the young generation think, so their advice is no exception. Take my experience as an example, a couple of years ago, I used to talk to my grandmother about everything, and she provided some solutions to the subjects I was concern about. As long as I grew up, I understood that these solutions seem so simple to me, and I could not use them in real life. Thus, I found that the differences in our lifestyles cause she can not understand the real situation of me.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that the grandparents` advice is not only practical but also is out of use.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-13 | nnnzzdcc | 94 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | shrijan | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Royaaa | 76 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | SERDARKOCAK | 70 | view |
| 2018-05-31 | Mohammadbj | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better for government to spend money on building modern housing than on preserving historic or traditional buildings and homes. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? “When people succeed, it is entirely because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with their success.” Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents should allow children to make mistakes and let them learn from their own mistakes 89
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they oppose the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- In terms of government expenses, which one is preferable? Is it better to spend money on new buildings or refund the old projects? 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 424, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
... we are human beings and using the past generations advice will be useful, the majority of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04314720812 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95935712339 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543147208122 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2355162551 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.388888889 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192566160321 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557621623552 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532907989255 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122157404487 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378300952727 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.