Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take at least one class that teaches the culture of a country other than their own.
Recently the phenomenon of universities' requirements courses has sparked a heated debate. In this connection, universities define a considerable amount of limitations for classes, in which pupils should engage. Although contested by many that the matter of providing insight into others' societies' cultures for children is highly beneficial, some an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that learning cultures of other countries cannot be a plus, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
Firstly, being familiar with other countries' cultures, which are taught at universities, is detrimental to students' own beliefs. To be more specific, each region has its attitudes shaping a culture of people, and make it distinctive from other cultures. Being aware of others' societies' beliefs influence students negatively, and deviates them from their origin. According to my own experience, I live in a country where drinking alcohol is prohibited according to our religion. Because nowadays, students know that people who live in other countries allow drinking alcohol, they do not obey not to drink it. However, in the past, Since people did not learn about other societies' beliefs, they insisted on accepting and continue their genuine feelings.
Secondly, gaining information about other countries' cultures is not helpful for students, so they can allocate their time to learn useful objects instead of that. To elucidate, universities can save students' time to prepare them for their future job, which affects their lives significantly. However, knowing other cultures are just general data, which do not guarantee pupils' success. For example, when I was a university student, my university instigated weak students' abilities, which play a vital role in our future, such as communication skills and time managing ability. Hence, persuade students to register in a class, which was according to our weakness. By doing so, classes had a positive impact as they taught practical knowledge, and did not waste our time.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that knowing about other cultures is not efficient for students. Not only does it hurt children's origin ideas, but it also teaches them unconvincing information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-29 | jalal heidary | 93 | view |
| 2021-06-16 | Rahn80643 | 60 | view |
| 2021-02-23 | Bita-pnh | 71 | view |
| 2021-02-13 | rashidi8061 | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-21 | Ooldwolf | 87 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The way people dress is a good indication of his or her personality or character 76
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to much information creates problems Which view do you agree with 60
- Which way do you think is the best for a student to make new friends Joining a sports team Participate in community activities Traveling 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In a group project the group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is 86
- Do you prefer watching TV programs for knowledge or just for entertainment 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47527472527 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91914317435 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601648351648 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4303786093 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.722222222 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280166504295 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086743494122 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437284929951 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152112870195 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571304122238 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.