Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
History can widen students' perspective to the world by showing correct or incorrect approaches used by their ancestors. Some people blieve that all students should be required to take history courses because of their phenomenal benefits; others assume otherwise, believing that can not be useful for all students. Personally speaking, I support the latter group because of two reasons.
First, requiring students to take histroy classes can consume great time of students. Students do not have a lot of time in university becasue of having different classes, projects, and exams. As a result, compling them to take a history classes can increase their burdun, and make them less successful in passing exams. For example, at university, I was to compelled to take a course called Andishe which was about religious matters. The professor was so stubborn and made me to be present all classes and do different projects, while its grade was nutrial in my final average grade. Because this class was so time consuming, I had to decrease my time allocation on other courses. As a result, my grades decreased a lot. So, adding a history class to students' curiculam can consume a lot of time from students.
Second, history courses are not beneficial for most students. Usually histroy courses are about the past, people of past, and matters of past, while most students are dealing with new technologies and ways which have not anything in common with histroy. For instance, I am a mechanical engineer, and I am dealing with mathe and physic. All of instrument in our lab is new and depend on new science. Although I have read a lot books about histroy in high-school, non of them have been useful in my major. In sum, history courses are useless for majority of students.
In conclusion, I believe that universities should not required students to take history courses because they can consume students' time, and they are useless for most of students.
- Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 60
- TPO 39 Independent task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- TPO 33 Integrated Writing Task
- TPO 52 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 55, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'require'
Suggestion: require
... I believe that universities should not required students to take history courses becaus...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the students') or simply say ''most students''.
Suggestion: most of the students; most students
...students time, and they are useless for most of students.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97852760736 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68972231279 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493865030675 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4902888558 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1666666667 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231318039475 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07460336818 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637668224067 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166329327784 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597001123844 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.