Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can deny that history is a powerful source of knowledge. Some students may believe that learning history as a requirement can not be as helpful as other courses that are presented in a university. However, in my opinion history courses can be quite beneficial for several reasons which I will elaborate on in the following paragraphs.
First of all, history has always thougth us how to proceed in future. Every step that has to be taken toward future was almost done in a similar way in the past. Strategies in diplomacy or Ford's industrialized revolution can teach everyone in any field how to react or make a change in a situation. In another example, if a company tries to debute it can be an enormous hinder to start from scratch. Yet, the knowledge of the past experiences can help that company to develope more quickly or even predict the upcoming problems or even a hint for a solution. For this reason students have to learn about events in the past.
Secondly, history is not just focused on a certain sequence of events. It can be about history of art or architecture. As an illustration, in my field which is architectural engineering, understanding the events and phenomenos that happend in a period of time can explain how specific patterns or structures were created. Moreover, some social revolutions or war caused a major shift in construction industry that without knowing or contemplating about those events can not be understood easily. As a result, taking history classes are definitly important.
In colclusion, it has to be mandatory for university students to learn about history to learn about what similar situations happend in the past and in more detail they should learn specific events that occured related to their field of study.
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is Thus the project o 3
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago there was a mass extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species 76
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 71
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ry has always thougth us how to proceed in future. Every step that has to be taken toward...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... be taken toward future was almost done in a similar way in the past. Strategies in diplomacy or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 426, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...from scratch. Yet, the knowledge of the past experiences can help that company to develope more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...events and phenomenos that happend in a period of time can explain how specific patterns or st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90666666667 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9098377198 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556666666667 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7232658518 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1333333333 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193148840524 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664440290385 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046814963678 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128020499574 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463279802046 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ry has always thougth us how to proceed in future. Every step that has to be taken toward...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... be taken toward future was almost done in a similar way in the past. Strategies in diplomacy or...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 426, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...from scratch. Yet, the knowledge of the past experiences can help that company to develope more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...events and phenomenos that happend in a period of time can explain how specific patterns or st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90666666667 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9098377198 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556666666667 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7232658518 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1333333333 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193148840524 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664440290385 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046814963678 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128020499574 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463279802046 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.