In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
In my opinion, In the past it had crusialy been easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a prosperes lifestyle. I think this way for several reasons which I will elaborate in next paragraphs.
First of all, in the past there has been a handfull of people or families that had wealthy and rich life, which it was mainly around typical jobs or fields of careers. That can cause the identification of a successful future much easier. As a historical example, around world war I in United kingdom in most rural areas there was a family who was the land lord of the most reigons, and people usualy worked for that family in those agricultual fields. In addition being closer to those families could be more beneficial and lead to a secure future. For this reason, it was obvious that working in corrolation with wealthy people would bring success.
Secondly, nowadays creativity has provided different paths to become prosperes. Like the development of technology and digitalization has created abundant approaches for a great lifestyle that makes it difficult to pick and grow in a field. For example, many startups has been advented that broke the stricted categories of the past, that brings the creativily a key role for progress, however, a hinder for many people to achive.
In another way, education was limited in the past which led to cirtain fields and majors to follow. But, in current society different majors and various branches are prepared for different mindsets to be developed. That's why it can be harder for students to decide on which path they want to follow in their life so it moght cause frustration.
In conclusion, I believe less variaty of majors, jobs and less creativity in the past could cause identifing a secure and successful future much easier . However, less oportunity means it was much more difficult to be succesful in the past and you had to work a lot harder for gaining a secure future than it is today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 71
- Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds 83
- At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago there was a mass extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 76
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 177, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'causes'.
Suggestion: causes
...cal jobs or fields of careers. That can cause the identification of a successful futu...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... family in those agricultual fields. In addition being closer to those families could be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...for different mindsets to be developed. Thats why it can be harder for students to de...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...secure and successful future much easier . However, less oportunity means it was m...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79351032448 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65559896866 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53982300885 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0454780235 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308786761939 0.236089414692 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100716608805 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120140883286 0.0737576698707 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168984814346 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120319682801 0.0645574589148 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.