Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvement for the quality of people's lives has already taken place.
In today's progressive world we live in, no one can turn a blind eye to the significance of technology. When it comes to whether the technology will continue to fall people's lives under its influence or not, there are different ideas. Some people believe that technology will change life quality in the coming decades as much as in the past decades. Others hold the notion that technology has already has achieved its best results. From my vantage point, the first group carries more weight. I will explain my reasons to support my idea.
First, the goal of science and technology is to boost the standards of human life so, the more progress of science and technology, the higher the quality of life. It was hard for people in the past generation to imagine this quality of life we now have, and it is also hard to guess how technology would change people's lives in the future. If you ask someone who lives in 1800 to predict life in the current century, they really couldn't give a realistic approach. People in the past generation couldn't imagine having video calls with others on the farthest continents or share live videos. These are significant treasure troves of technology and, Surprise inventions that will continue to change human life unpredictably.
Second, there are so many problems that technology and science just try to solve, and the world is not that sheer heaven right now. Environmental issues, global warming, poverty and hunger, lack of resources, unfair distribution of wealth, unbalance in the quality of life in the different parts of the world, to name a few. Although our lives are much better than before, we still far-fetched from an ideal life that actually sync with human deserve. So, technology and science via solving these issues will keep enhancing living standards and make living conditions better for the next generations.
In conclusion, all reasons mentioned above lead us to the conclusion that improvement of world changes as a result of technology and science will keep its speed because of its unpredictable nature, and also there is a lot of challenges in the worlds that they need to solve by science and cutting-edge technology.
- Tpo44
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in today s world have become too dependent on automobiles Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone online games and social networking Web site 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 429, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ife in the current century, they really couldnt give a realistic approach. People in th...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 494, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...approach. People in the past generation couldnt imagine having video calls with others ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, really, second, so, still, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94005449591 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66773218052 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550408719346 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2746520445 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.3125 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276057255465 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084767365164 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446025526489 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157590922821 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324572118259 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.