do you agree or disagree with the following statement?the automobile is destroying our quality of life.
use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion
As time passes, life on this planet becomes more complicated, and humans try to make their life easier through devising specific tools. It is incontrovertibly axiomatic that automobiles are one of the most important inventions in the last century. With this in mind, controversy exists as to whether cars are overall beneficial or not. While some argue that automobile is destroying our quality of life, others believe otherwise. I, based on my knowledge and experience, subscribe to the latter idea. The reasons why I believe so will be elaborated upon hereunder.
First of all, by using cars life gets more convenient and efficient. People in the past had to travel far distances between cities on foot or the back of animals; such as horses, mules, and so forth. They had to spend days on the road, to reach their destinations. Sometimes, they got sick or even died on these arduous trips. On the other hand, those hard and time spending travels have become swift and enjoyable, thanks to the widespread use of automobiles these days. Moreover, nowadays people use their automobiles to go on picnics and vacations in their free time and visit interesting places whenever they want. It is an option that our ancestors did not have. Maybe they heard about beautiful places and interesting cities, but they could not go and see.
Second, using cars has improved the economy of people and their country. These days, many people rely on their cars to make money and feed their families, such as Taxi drivers. Also, there are many businesses around the country that by using cars can deliver their stuff and services much faster and safer to their costumers. Moreover, governments are thriving too, because not only do they are worried about their people, but also they can add to taxes, therefore, have better financial situations.
In conclusion, with all this taken into account, I believe that cars not only have not destroyed our quality of life but also have improved it in many ways. Using cars has facilitated life and increased the level of welfare in the whole country.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- which one is more important to you for having an enjoyable vacation good friends good accommodation good foods 75
- p 3
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and examples to supp 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
.... With this in mind, controversy exists as to whether cars are overall beneficial or not. Whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93162393162 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58919661119 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578347578348 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6920972418 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.55 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.55 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159632950779 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492979967453 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525053167619 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110658478872 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591071411636 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.