Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Sicnce the dawn of humanity, happiness has been crucially important for humans. These days, the quality of life plays an indispensable role on human emotion and should be noticed to make the life more enjoyable. When it comes to this point, people have some debates as to whether modern people are more happy in their life or people in the past. Personally, though, I agree with the first group and in what follows, two reasons will be discussed to shed light on this idea.
The first reason comming to my mind to substantiate my standpoint is that today people have more paid time off from their job. The shorter working days provide a good chance for people to have more fun and spend more leisure time. Moreover, they obssess longer vacations that thay can spend it on a trip. My last generation experience demonstrates convincing evidence of this. When my father was a child, a vast number of peole worked on the farmlands and they tried to harvest products to improve the quality of life and made their ends meet. Therefore, people who spent the whole of the day on the farmlend were not happy at all because of the pressure of the life.
Another noteworthy point corroborating my stance is that modern society proved more opportunity for weman to work and educate. In the past, weman ought to bacame a housewife and were expected to raise their children and do houshold chores. Therefore, they could not participete in the society and they were preventent from communication. For instance, My parents encourage me to be a good doctor and provide for me educational facilities to thrive. If they had not provided environment for me I would not have taken my degree and would not have been happy like now.
To sum up, based on all argumentation stated above, I stongly believe that people are more happeir than in the past because they have more leisure time that can spend to relax their mind and weman are more enjoyfull because of the opportunity to be in the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | Somayya | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | mashghanbar | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | mazenghonem | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 76 | view |
- do you agree or disagree with the following satetement? parents today are more involved in theis childrens education than were parents in the past. Use specifice reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? some people say that the internet proviedes people with a lot of valuable information. others think access to much information craetes problems. Which veiw do you agree with? 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agreeor disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements makes products seem much better that they really are 80
- TPO 25 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...to this point, people have some debates as to whether modern people are more happy in their l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 347.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73775216138 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55135202159 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544668587896 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6430388922 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.75 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6875 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154406487576 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519110846387 0.076458572812 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540583747222 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101385946158 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325757254479 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.