Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Alternations have a deep impact on people’s personal satisfaction of* their lives. I strongly believe that any change, which has been occurred, helps humanity to be delighted, which I will elaborate on this conviction by giving two specific examples.
first, with the passage of time, medical science has undergone major alternations which assist human beings in living longer and preventing them from being despondent. In the past, people would have been under lots of pressure during winter and harsh situations because they often had to face difficulties, such as the lack of food, water, an appropriate place to live, and so forth. They were not always successful in dealing with them, feeling either weak or sad because they neither can protect themselves nor their hearties; However, by some advancements in treatments, people can handle every arisen problem caused by not having proper shelter or food or even disease. For example, in the past, the general public could not cope with pandemics at all. On the contrary, now they can handle even the covid-19 outbreak by finding coronavirus vaccine which shows how these changes have been helping us to tackle any problem and feel safe and strong.
Second, people, the majority of whom are working, do not work as hard as people in the past did. To be more specific, fifty years ago, people had to rely on their fields to provide some food and money for the rest of their life and working was so demanding and needs hours of insistence and hard work resulted in either death or severe injuries; However, now, citizens have to stay at home and run their business and it does not have any difficulties like hard work, being exposed to Zoonotic diseases, and so forth. Being either at home or the workplace, they feel convenient much more than their ancestors. For example, my dad always had told me some stories about the past in Iran before I was born. I was convinced by my father’s stories that at those ages there were no roads even for traveling let alone treatments. people might have cured their scars and injuries by putting clothe on them, I do not know why, but it shows the difference from now.
To sum up, I wholeheartedly believe that by elapsing time people have felt more relaxed given the less pressure they have to follow through as well as less stress they might feel when working.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 75 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | farjam | 60 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...ion by giving two specific examples. first, with the passage of time, medical scie...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 706, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... disease. For example, in the past, the general public could not cope with pandemics at all. O...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 823, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ven for traveling let alone treatments. people might have cured their scars and injuri...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, well, for example, such as, as well as, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84691358025 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48339585882 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 90.9606328842 48.9658058833 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.214285714 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9285714286 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229289153272 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775270774232 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422502986498 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125170911487 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452017738289 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.