Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that travelling using tours has several advantages over travelling independently. Indeed, when we review trips memories shared by people in social networks, it would be good insight to prove this fact. Contrary to this popular belief, there are still those who argue that in travelling independently, people have more freedom about their activities and do not need to harmonize themselves with others, so travel alone would be more enjoyable. However, I, to a great extent, disagree with this idea that the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
First and foremost, travel by tours is cheaper than independent travelling. Most travel logs know some hotels with appropriate quality and modest price. Especially, because they reserve hotels for a large number of people, they have some discounts. In addition, transportation costs would be really lower in this way. For example, last year when I decided to travel to Turkish, when I compared travel cost by each of these two types. I had found out that my travel cost would be about half trough travelling by a tour than I want to travel alone.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that travel by tour would be safer than travel alone. It is very important specifically when people want to travel to an unknown region, or countries which do not have enough security. For example, I conducted a trip to the central desert of Iran. I had some experience of travel to deserts. Nonetheless, this region was completely different from my previous trips. There was not any village or sanctuary. Moreover, my GPS did not work accurately, and I missed the true way. It was a very dangerous experience for me, and I never want to repeat it.
Finally, yet importantly, travelling by a group of people would be a good opportunity to find new friends. Always, finding some confidence people with same travelling interest is a problem. Nevertheless, on the trips, you can know and make a relationship with people who have a lot of similarities with you. For example, I found my mountain climbing partners for an ascent to Damavand in one of this type of trips.
On the basis of reasons that were mentioned above, I am convinced that travelling with a group of people led by a tour guide is better than travelling independently. Because we can save some money, and it is safer, and it is well chance to make new friends.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign country. 73
- Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...cially, because they reserve hotels for a large number of people, they have some discounts. In ad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Always' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...a good opportunity to find new friends. Always, finding some confidence people with sa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, really, so, still, well, for example, in addition, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2029.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84248210024 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81656888853 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525059665871 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.9874642082 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5416666667 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4583333333 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23667341476 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697868964591 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809582456313 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143105246446 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471840768909 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.