Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Businesses should hire employees for their entire life
There is always a controversy as to whether businesses should hire employees for their entire lives or not. Some people believe that the business organizations should work with permanent employee and they should not be able to fire them. In contrast, there are a great number of people who insist on thoroughly opposite idea. Personally, I subscribe to the idea that employer should be able to fire or to change their employee. I will explicate my view point in following paragraphs.
First of all, it is generally agreed that all business organizations need improvement and development in order to compete with other companies. In this way, employers should be allowed to fire those employees that do not work properly. Besides, when an employer hires employees for the lifetime, employees may lose their creativity and productivity; therefore, they will not strive to be better because they are confident about their job. In addition, recent researches illustrate that those employees that have temporary contract with companies, have more impetus to show their ability and they endeavor to be best. Thus this may help business organizations and companies improve.
Another equally significant point is about new force labors. If all companies hire employees for their entire lives, all job will be occupied and there will not vacant places for new force labors. Therefore, the unemployment rate will significantly increase because of lack of job in society. Moreover, the companies deprive from fresh force labors that have update knowledge. For instance, last year, in my father’s company he hired a new engineer that had update knowledge about his work and he fired his previous engineer because he could not work with new facilities; thus, with this decision he raised the level of his company. Therefore, if he had not been allowed to fire his employee, he would have paid more salary and this was not desirable.
In conclusion, hire employees for their entire lives is not a good decision. It seems obvious that this decision affects companies and new force labors. Companies hire employees for the sake of their improvement and they should be allowed to fire them if they do not work properly. Moreover, in order to decrease rate of unemployment new force labors should be replaced with those employees who do not have sufficient skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-31 | Vinnes | 81 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | mehran.ghafarian | 63 | view |
- integrated task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Businesses should hire employees for their entire life 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
There is always a controversy as to whether businesses should hire employees for th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 617, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...r ability and they endeavor to be best. Thus this may help business organizations an...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15404699739 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77164346778 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469973890339 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0644334833 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.15 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312459863097 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104846486845 0.076458572812 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994574590206 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226646035942 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074827328581 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.