Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children should be required to follow strict rules set by their parents. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Do not use memorized examples.
Most families have their own rules and some parents strongly force their children to obey them, while some families don’t. Personally, I believe that excessive regulations of children does not have a good influence for their education and growth. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, extremely strong constraints may hamper the development of children’s judgment abilities, confidences and self-esteems. Sometimes it is presumable that a child’s opinion violates his/her parent’s one. If parents scold their children every such moment, children may consider that their parents’ viewpoint take precedence over their own judgments. So, their judgment abilities and self-esteems can be underdeveloped. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a high school student, there were several friends whose parents are severely rigorous. They are pressured regarding their grades, future paths, and styles of life and expenditure. I could frequently observe the circumstances that they can’t make their autonomous decisions because of their parents.
Secondly, coercive regulations made by parents can be responsible for discords between parent and child. We should notice that parent’s castigation may provoke child’s revolt. Their emotional bones will be deepen as their friction occurs often. Thus it may cause severe ruptures between parent and child which cannot be easily recovered. For instance, my younger brother was not highly motivated about studying in a high school, and his academic performance was quite sluggish. However, my parents forced him to study much more harder and consequently, they conflicted almost every day when my brother was in the first year of high school. I think that their emotional bones triggered by those events are not completely recovered yet.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that it is definitely not a good idea to compel children to follow inordinately harsh rules made by parents. This is because it may impede maturing children’s ability to make their own decision and insist it confidently, and stimulate frequent strife between parent and child.
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most comp 66
- Everyone faces challenges they have difficulty overcoming These challenges are often related our school life our family life or our academic life What do you think is the best way to deal with a problem that is difficult to solve 1 asking someone with mor 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children should be required to follow strict rules set by their parents Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Do not use memorized examples 88
- Everyone faces challenges they have difficulty overcoming These challenges are often related our school life our family life or our academic life What do you think is the best way to deal with a problem that is difficult to solve 1 asking someone with mor 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... deepen as their friction occurs often. Thus it may cause severe ruptures between pa...
^^^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'harder' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: harder
...er, my parents forced him to study much more harder and consequently, they conflicted almos...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53115727003 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90510664543 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60237388724 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4497688744 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.85 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171664904073 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543732673328 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316695793812 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111830527563 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173938712541 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.