Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children should only study or play and don’t have to do household chores.
That children grow rapidly both mentally and physically during childhood is an axiom. Parents implement different nurturing methods in order to reinforce these two crucial aspects. A question, which is a matter of debate, a controversial one, is, whether children should take part in household activities or their task is just studying and playing. Although it is a little hard to reach a consensus on this issue, I am, to a great extent on the belief that the positive results arisen from participating in household chores have significant importance. The following reasons would elaborate on the thesis.
To commence, one of the compelling reasons that justifies the thesis is that through participating in household activities children learn the meaning of cooperation and assistance. To put it general words, assigning simple house duties to little kids prepared them for greater contribution in the future. Simply stated, although studying and playing have the important role in child’s life, these crucial tasks could not teach a child the importance of having the spirit of cooperation and assistance. To elucidate on, seen positive feedbacks of parents while helping them, children will be persuaded to assist other people of the society. To delineate, gradually cooperation will become part of the child’s personality which help him a lot while entering the society. It goes without saying that nothing even studying in the best schools could compensate for the little assigned household activities through which children comprehend they should lend helping hand in their life. To shed more light on the issue, according to the result of the study conducted on two groups of elementary school students, those who help their parents in household works are more successful in team working and assisting other members of the group.
Another reason which is of equal importance if not more is that contributing in household chores will teach children responsibility. Broadly speaking, having a sense of responsibility for assigned tasks teaches children the meaning of responsibility at an early age. To clarify, encouraging children to participate in house duties make them responsible individuals. Going into depth, having discovered that they are in charge of some tasks, children will become definitely responsible people for greater duties in the future. It is all transparent that although children learn some aspects of life while educating, rarely do they comprehend the importance of responsibility as there are no serious delegated responsibilities in playing and studying. Needless to say, the more children fortify the moral responsibility in themselves, the better they can handle the greater responsibilities in their future. However, what I mentioned above might not be overgeneralize to all contexts. Sometimes compelling children to allocate part of their time to doing household chores distract them and damage their education. Nevertheless they are more of an exception rather than a general rule.
Drawing upon the reasons, although there are always some exceptions which are excluded from the general rule, I do agree that making children to participate in household duties offers numerous advantages. To recapitulate the reasons, not only do they comprehend the meaning of cooperation and assistance, but also they will become more responsible people in their future life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | mohamadjhr | 66 | view |
| 2017-09-22 | maryamz90 | 91 | view |
| 2017-04-13 | Reyhaneh1990 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'generals'?
Suggestion: generals
...f cooperation and assistance. To put it general words, assigning simple house duties to...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1113, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...stract them and damage their education. Nevertheless they are more of an exception rather th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, broadly speaking, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2889.0 1977.66487455 146% => OK
No of words: 526.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49239543726 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04566831832 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492395437262 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 898.2 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1830426795 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.608695652 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8695652174 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65217391304 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207942363371 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576842519458 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415949101995 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133257387329 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122381734961 0.0645574589148 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.