Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Drivers should pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is a great heavy traffic.
It is incontrovertible that driving has been giving great benefits to us for the last decades. After all, nowadays we see some cities with heavy traffics. Yet, there could be a debate over driving in such cities; should we be allowed to drive in heavy traffics? Some might argue that people should be allowed to drive while in heavy traffics. However, I believe that they must be punished and pay a fee should they drive in such situation for two reasons.
To begin with, it is obvious that upon driving in heavy traffics, people cause everything to go from bad to worse, and, in this way, they will definitely produce more pollution. In fact, creating pollution is harmful to our health and environment. From my personal experience, I had a car while in high school. I was used to driving in heavy traffics, and I never preferred to use public transportation under any circumstances. To be honest, I knew that It was deleterious, but I could not help using my own car. This was because there was no rule to restrict me from doing that although my parents always talked me out of doing it. After a while, I heard a piece of news that says, “People driving cars in heavy traffics will be forced to pay a fee because they contribute to creation pollution.” I realized that I was on the wrong tract, and I tried to kick the habit. Had I not drive in such situation, I would have more useful to my society. This clearly depicts that all drivers tending to drive in heavy traffics should be compelled to pay a fee because it can prohibit them from doing it.
Another major consideration is that if people drives in such circumstance, they cause psychological problems for others. This means that after a day’s work, we want to go home and relax there and then. But when the traffics are bumper to bumper, we will definitely get angry and lose our tempers very quickly. To illustrate this, one should see no further than enforcing a new law prohibiting people from driving in heavy traffics. This is due to the fact that in this way, people can use public transportation and contribute to decrease the traffic more and more. Therefore, we can assume that this law will give us great advantages.
In summary, there are numerous reasons to believe that punishing people driving in busy cities by forcing them to pay a fee can make all the difference. This will allow us to diminish pollution and helping others to go home soon and unwind after working long hours.
- Which of the following ways is the best for early education of children aged 3 to 6 Preparing written books for them to read Reading loudly to them Communicating with them 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is not beneficial for a child s learning 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Drivers should pay a fee for driving in busy city streets when there is a great heavy traffic 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is a good idea to sometimes stop reading and listening to news for a period of few days or weeks 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Although science and technology will continue to improve the most significant improvements for the quality of people s lives have already taken place 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive in such situation for two reasons. To begin with, it is obvious that upon d...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se it can prohibit them from doing it. Another major consideration is that if p...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his law will give us great advantages. In summary, there are numerous reasons t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, therefore, while, after all, in fact, in summary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61958997722 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6492957675 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492027334852 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5363278219 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1818181818 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9545454545 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13636363636 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252847641689 0.236089414692 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766129054269 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640902833214 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159191338477 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616395929668 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.