A controversial debate is raised about the quality of good leaders. Some people hold the view that good ;leaders should not take into consideration other people's ideas. However, some others may have a different view and believe that it is better to be open minded and listen to other people's ideas. Form my vantage point, I concur with the later group for that open minded people can enhance their knowledge and be more communicative with others.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that by listening to others leaders can enhance their knowledge. leaders who are open minded take the opportunity to listen to people and learn from them. Without listening to the concerns of others a leader would be able to accomplish his tasks properly. A vivid example which can illustrate by view is a leader who were asked for a an increase in wages from his employees. After several years of continuous demand by employees for a wage increase and without any response by the leader, many of the top performing employees quite the company.
The second reason which deserves some attention is that leaders who listen to others make employees happy. Employees who feels that they are nobody is listening to them develop low self esteem and loose motivation. An important duty of a leader is to keep employees motivated. Without motivation cannot perform their functions and feel frustrated. Thus a smart leader would consider encouraging employees to work more by listening to them.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle reason which worth to be mentioned. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible study that was conducted in 120 leaders which showed that leaders who listen to others are 50% more chance of succeeding in their careers than their peers who implement their own view. The study was conducted leaders from different organizations to prevent bias.
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reason, one soon realizes that leaders who listen to other gain more knowledge and is able to talented employees.
- Watching television is bad for children. Do you agree or disagree? 76
- Do you agree or disagree the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed. 75
- the possibilty of the use of an ancient weapon by the Greeks in a war against the Romans 78
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. First, atmospheric 68
- Some people say that physical exercise should be done in gym or sport center Other people believe that exercise should done outdoors in open air. Which opinion do you agree with? 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Leaders
...rs leaders can enhance their knowledge. leaders who are open minded take the opportunit...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... by view is a leader who were asked for a an increase in wages from his employees...
^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: a; an
... by view is a leader who were asked for a an increase in wages from his employees. A...
^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rm their functions and feel frustrated. Thus a smart leader would consider encouragi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h worth to be mentioned. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible study that was ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0676056338 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73723398904 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512676056338 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4205729138 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6842105263 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6842105263 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63157894737 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245244491838 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820641356918 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677823716266 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142623578759 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057258920903 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.