Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation.
The government should spend more money on public transportation than on access to the Internet. However, both of them have their own pros and cons. For instance, some people believe that spending more money on access to the Internet may cause to facilitate access to the information and electronic transaction, but allocating enough budget on public transportation, in my opinion, is further important due to decreasing air pollution and traffic, also increasing economic growth.
Spending more money on public transportation may lead to decrease the air pollution. Based on reported in the literature, in industrial cities for instance in Tehran, approximately 5 million people travel each day to reach their work settings. For such a huge quantities of traveling, the government should provide public transportation. If the government spend money on access to the Internet, instead of spending on public transportation, because of lack of an available transportation people will try to use their own automobiles to reach their work settings. This may arise some problems such as air pollution and traffic. The traffic itself likely put citizens in a chaotic situation. For example, people will wait much more time on traffic and therefore could not to reach their work settings on-time. So, people are required to wake rather earlier than usual and spend much more time on roads to reach their workplaces. Finally, they have much less time for their family members.
There live more people in the big cities rather than small towns. This is because persons often migrate from small town to big cities aiming to get a career. Therefore, it is obvious that cities with more population have much more economic growth. This is because in the big cities demand is high than in small cities. So, much more factories there are and much more people there need to employ. This huge amount of people coming from small towns in addition to natives are required a developed transportation system to get their work daily.
In conclusion, however, a person can acclaim that facilitating to access the Internet would lead to facilitate in getting the information and electronic transaction and so forth, but without having a developed public transportation members of a city, especially in big cities would encounter with some problems.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation. 73
- The widespread use of the internet has given people access to information on a level never before experienced. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today’s world. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students who keep their rooms neat and organized will be more likely to succeed than students who do not. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The telephone has a greater influence on people’s lives than Television has. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'facilitating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: facilitating
...ney on access to the Internet may cause to facilitate access to the information and electroni...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'quantity'?
Suggestion: quantity
...ch their work settings. For such a huge quantities of traveling, the government should pro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtation system to get their work daily. In conclusion, however, a person can acc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21066666667 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88793228606 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474666666667 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.7636397561 48.9658058833 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.842105263 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7368421053 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254951847058 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954953529955 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124299049462 0.0737576698707 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171099206085 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987498488919 0.0645574589148 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.