Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments and private companies should share their scientific discoveries with the rest of the world.
Throughout historyscientific discoverieshas played a prominent role in all societies. Due to its paramount importanceall societies is thrivingand human societies will experience facilitate life.A controversial question which is often raised regarding this idea is,discoveries should not be shared for rest of world and it is belong to specific government or private firm who are wastingtime on scientific discoveries .From my vantage point, scientific discoveries should be share.
In the following paragraphs, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that sharing scientific discoveries will be inspiring sort of investments companies from all over the world to cooperate with the governments or private companies. In fact, these kinds of discoveries are unexpectedexpenditures especially when they need to make or purchase specific high-tech equipment for their plans. For avoiding facing lack of budget they should ask for extra forces join them due to keep the procedures survive. By injecting finance to the discovery tasks, they will push it to have beneficial consultation for helping human societies and world markets simultaneously.A bright example is: huge amount of peoplehad died because of epidemicplague and scientists have discovered the antitoxin. By sharing the antitoxin lots of people survived and all costs of brand new innovation in medical science have been compensated by sharing and selling it all over the world.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that scientific discoveriesare sequence of events leading up to germinate next discoveries. By sharing them to rest of worldthey can be used as foundationin other industries developments. A telecommunication industry isnot exceptional.Alexander Graham Bellachievement has revolutionized telecommunication industry by introducing telephone and nowall over the world people are communicating in a fraction of second. Moreover, his innovation has been caused next discoveries happenings and scientistsociety has been triggered the idea of communicating beyond the Earth boarders. Nobodymay not believe that one day human could design a spacecraft and lunch it and land on Moon then hear a voice of first man“Nile Armstrong” from Moon. By sharing the man innovation, several next scientific discoveriesare happened and Human society knowledge is bombardedby huge amount of data.
To make a long story short,not all advantages are listed above. Only, dominant reasons are mentioned. Although, others think government or private companies should not share their discovery because of some abuses in lunching discoveries. In spite the fact that several abuses may happenthis is my deep belief that without sharing scientific discoveries, lack of investments and hinder of next discoveries happenings are concluded that they are against of scientific discoveries thriving.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-14 | AugustRush | 76 | view |
2019-10-14 | AugustRush | 85 | view |
- TPO 22- Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Scientists should be responsible for the negative impacts of their discoveries 91
- TPO-13 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- T P O 14 Integrated Writing Task 72
- TOEFL TPO 13 - Integrated Writing Task 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...cieties will experience facilitate life.A controversial question which is often r...
^
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , discoveries
...h is often raised regarding this idea is,discoveries should not be shared for rest of world ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...t be shared for rest of world and it is belong to specific government or private firm ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... to specific government or private firm who are wastingtime on scientific discoveries ....
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...re wastingtime on scientific discoveries .From my vantage point, scientific discov...
^^
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
... wastingtime on scientific discoveries .From my vantage point, scientific discoverie...
^^^^
Line 1, column 475, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'shared'?
Suggestion: shared
...point, scientific discoveries should be share. In the following paragraphs, I will p...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 635, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...ieties and world markets simultaneously.A bright example is: huge amount of peopl...
^
Line 4, column 830, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
... people survived and all costs of brand new innovation in medical science have been compensate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Alexander
...ommunication industry isnot exceptional.Alexander Graham Bellachievement has revolutioniz...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 27, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , not
...unt of data. To make a long story short,not all advantages are listed above. Only, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, then, in fact, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2495.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85680751174 4.8611393121 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.58285255329 2.67179642975 134% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572769953052 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 772.2 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.5965187679 48.9658058833 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.611111111 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94444444444 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279898423278 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738413249498 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844665363738 0.0737576698707 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146214436885 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714855335535 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 11.7677419355 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 58.1214874552 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 10.9000537634 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.