Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should focus their budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development.
Environment, as we all know is our wealth. Although it may seem exaggerating at first sight, noticing the way that world is ruled now, one may find this contention sensible. In this era, we are facing with many natural deteriorations, which should take action to help it as soon as possible. In this regard, some people are inclined toward the opinion that, government should focus their budget more on environmental protection than on economic development. As far as I am concerned human beings lives deeply affected by environmental so, governments should focus more budget on it. I will delve into three conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first fact that makes me hold this belief is the industrial era. Based on recent research conducted in this area at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), as long as human enter to industrial period, environmental related issues such as air pollution are raised up. In fact, the more we path the industrial way, the more pollution we have.
Although there are more educated people in society than before, It doesn’t mean they pay more attention to the environment. Nowadays, life had been entered into a new phase. The phase of the hectic life. People do everything in a rush. They even eat half-ready food is packed with plastics which is harmful to the environment. Neglecting the above reasons, there are some people who ignore environmental issues. As a tangible example, I remember I had a friend who was careless about issues such as global warming, plastic in nature, forest burning and deforestation. She thinks these problems are going to happen even if we care about them. Considering it, there is a huge responsibility on government shoulder and it is cultivation. Governments should spend the budget to teach haphazard human actions which can expose nature with disastrous happens.
The last but not the least reason, there is some natural issue which deeply affected human beings lives that are out of their control. For example, pouring oil into sea bring serious effects on sea`s species ecology, we such as other mammals in land, haunt and eat marine creatures such as fish, shrimps and etc. that oil which once enters sea ecology now enter to our meal and also our body and this cycle will go on. For such a problem just governments can implement roles and laws.
To wrap it up, as a result of industrial era pollution is inevitable and solving this problem need government actions. Moreover, governments should do something for cultivation about environment issues among people because many of them belong to rush life and others are neglecting it. Also, some natural related issues are so huge and out of ordinary people control.
- In terms of government expenses, which one is preferable? Is it better to spend money on new buildings or refund the old projects? 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Compared with people who live in urban areas, the people who live in rural areas can take better care of their families. 90
- satisfactory jobs or secure jobs? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It’s better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than doing physical exercises. 80
- When you are assigned an important presentation for work or school do you prefer to work on it right away so that you can work on it a little bit every day or wait until you have a good idea about the presentation 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
... marine creatures such as fish, shrimps and etc. that oil which once enters sea ecology ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and out of ordinary people control.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, for example, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2289.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 453.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05298013245 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80175153349 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560706401766 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6009187077 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0384615385 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4230769231 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.19230769231 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227199687273 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595358000749 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090126309198 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121047961662 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100554259515 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.