Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.
Finding a proper occupation is one of the most controversial subjects, which often provoke many discussions. Some people keep endorsing the claim that it is better for infants to work in a field similar to their parents’ job whereas others dismiss this idea and prefer to choose a job differential to their parents’ field of work. My firm conviction is that working in a field similar to our parents is a better choice. In what follows, I will thoroughly elucidate what rationales my perspective is based on.
The first and most significant reason why I am of this opinion is that parents have decades of work experience in that field, and they have built on practical connections and working opportunities with other work force in this market. Indeed, it is indisputable that their colleagues or employers can give a helping hand, and facilitate the complicated rout of entering the job market, and their credit created by years of working in this field is helpful for us too. My own experience as an architect that have chosen to work in a related field to her father’s, is a compelling example of this claim. Given that my father is a civil engineer, he has been working on various construction projects throughout the city. Right after my education he offered me to design the architectural plan and façade of one of his projects. Only later after its construction, I was offered multiple projects by other employers to design their projects. In fact, this opportunity provides me the chance to introduce my concepts and design approach to others in this highly competitive job market and obviously, I was assumed as a master architect in the shadow of my father’s credit.
Secondly, parents are experts in their career and after decades of gathering experience are totally aware of potential intricacies in that special field. Accordingly, they count as a valuable in touch treasure for us in order to learn required knowledge and skills. In view of this opportunity, we can always stay one step forward from our competitors as long as our parents can transfer their experience to us not only free of charge but also whenever its required. Taking the experience of my own, I had specialized my theoretical major in mathematic during high school education; therefore, like any other student, I encountered many difficulties in solving differential equations. My mother, educated in Mathematics, hopefully helped me to open regardless of time and place; hence, hardly I was graded low and I was always among top students.
To put it in a nutshell, sticking to our parents filed of working can be an outstanding choice, because their social connections can provide us opportunities to commerce our own business as soon as is possible. On the other hand, simply they are capable of helping us with potential technical problems in this way and provide us with an in-touch source of knowledge and skill.
- causes of cedar trees population decrease 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- is it better to preserve a long-term friendship with a few people or to find new friends easily 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Grades marks encourage students to learn 90
- the veracity of stories about Bredan s voyage 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2433.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9856557377 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96020748812 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520491803279 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 756.9 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0598602093 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.166666667 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187078359326 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587811442173 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879015708323 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127621911008 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859130398008 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.