Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have friends who are intelligent than to have friends who have a good sense of humor.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that humans spend most of their time with their friend and their behaviors have an impact on our life and way toward the success; thus selecting a friend has played a predominant role in people’s life. People should notice to some characteristics which are compulsory for a good friend. Not all people concur when this issue arises. To being cognizant to the logic behind those who repudiate or endorse the legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that cleverness of friends is more notable properties than his/her sense of humor. Among a plentitude of reason in support of this assertion, the ability to advise a proper solution in bottleneck situations and urge for attempting hard to acquire success could be picked out for further analysis.
To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however regarding the undeniable mind’s power of clever friends in hardships, based upon the statistics of different general questionnaires in sundry countries, people are unanimous about the conviction that intelligent friends could find some worthwhile solution for some problems which normal people could not gain them. Their minds are more creative and help them to survive in difficult situations. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. Last year me and my friend work on a mutual project in big biorefinery company. Our duty was the start-up and optimizing the ethanol production. One day, I had a problem in control of the reproduction rate of some bio cells in the reactors. I have read all instructions and simulate the process. But I could not fix the problem. When I was very hopeless my friend with a little trick in changing the temperature solved this issue. On that day, I found that the merit of having ingenious friends which save my time and energy.
In addition to the reason raised above; encouragement effect of these types of the friend could also substantiate the justifiability of the claim made at the outset of this essay. In conjunction with public belief, friends behavior effect on each other; consequently, an intelligent friend is successful and prosperous in their life. Thus, when some normal friend observes his/her friend, he stimulates to work harder and compensate his shortcomings with serious efforts. Finally, this procedure obtains success in his life. For instance, my friend, Reza, have produced some powerful articles in the chemical engineering. All professor at our university introduced him as the good researcher. I really eager to do research based projects and I decided to consult him for publishing an article in my research area. Now I send a good article to the famous journal. He encourages me and helps me to write this paper.
Drawing up the reason, discreetly put, as far as my personal perspective on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that it is more beneficial for us to find ingenious friends than humorous friends. These friends not only help us in difficult situations by unique solution proposal but also urge us to gain success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-15 | meliiw_amd | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | SAGm | 60 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | sena | 70 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | eglantine74 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-05 | jiaoj27@hotmail.com | 66 | view |
- Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by person who often strongly insists th 36
- Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- In order to attract more tourists the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets Which way do you think is more effective 77
- Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently when it appeared that a 70-milli 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...has yet to be reached; however regarding the undeniable mind's power of cle...
^^
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ached; however regarding the undeniable mind's power of clever friends in h...
^^
Line 2, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thwhile solution for some problems which normal people could not gain them. Their...
^^
Line 2, column 866, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ocess. But I could not fix the problem. When I was very hopeless my friend with a li...
^^^^
Line 3, column 743, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ager to do research based projects and I decided to consult him for publishing an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, however, if, really, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2605.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 519.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01926782274 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8730333117 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55105973025 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 809.1 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.7008831145 48.9658058833 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.192307692 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9615384615 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260822181172 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638557888591 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645647285931 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157424247727 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440205563901 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 86.8835125448 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.