Comparison of the earlier centuries, society has accepted that knowledge is essentially crucial; thus, governments and communities offer a wide range of opportunities where an individual can expand their knowledge. However, one contentious debate is whether it is better to have in-depth knowledge of a subject or a general understanding of all areas. No one can dispute that each option has both advantages and disadvantages. However, if I had to pick, I would rather have a solid foundation in one area than broad knowledge of everything. I stand by my view for several reasons, which I will develop in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, if one is talented at one subject, one can determine their dreams and goals. Many students have difficulty finding their ambition and interests in school. Hence, many students come to college unprepared and hesitant about what to major in, and in most cases, their life plan stalls since they try to explore. However, if one is good at a particular field from an early age, one does not have to worry about it, and one can set their goal and reach it quickly. I must admit that my experience has significantly impacted how I feel about this issue. You see, at a young age, I was intrigued by magazines and articles since they contained interesting topics and illustrated creativity in diverse ways. I began to work hard in my writing creativity and student media club after that peak of interest, allowing me to decide to study communication and media during my university years.
On top of that, the potential to be a top player in a field allows for respect and recognition. Usually, people talented in many domains care about many departments, so it is challenging to succeed in one specialty. However, if one works hard in a specific major, one can become an expert in that field. Drawing from my sister's experience, although she is average in other subjects like language arts and biology, she is very good at math, so students and professors call her Ms. Albert Eisten. Students always ask her if they have a tricky math problem. Therefore, if one excels in one field like this, people will recognize and respect them.
Based on the reasons mentioned, I firmly believe it is better to grow and excel in one field than in many subjects.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 90
- Although dinosaurs are considered as the strongest creatures that have ever lived on Earth they were not strong enough to defy extinction Since there are no definite data that could identify the cause of extinction many theories have been suggested These 80
- Humans have been battling the tropical disease malaria since at least the late fourth century B C This debilitating and deadly disease is actually a parasite which reproduces in humans and is spread through the saliva of mosquitoes when they suck blood fr 81
- Your local government has just recently received a large donation from an anonymous donor to improve the community Almost everyone agrees that the money should be invested in building a new public facility Which of the following do you think your local go 76
- Although Johannes Vermeer is famous for his masterpiece Girl with a Pearl Earring not much is known about who modeled for the painting The curiosity aroused by the mystery brought about several theories about the true identity of the model The first candi 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'succeeding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: succeeding
... many departments, so it is challenging to succeed in one specialty. However, if one works...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, i feel, in most cases, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84987277354 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81407450832 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577608142494 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1790800308 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.315789474 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6842105263 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231191335314 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709679781041 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660049242846 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146016277403 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255889664334 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.