During the last decades, human beings can take themselves apart from others in societies through education. In fact, education has paved the way for further success. One of the heated debates in this realm is whether one should specialize in one or many subjects. Although there might be some counterexamples for this claim, I argue that it is far better to be competent in various academic subjects to expand our range of knowledge and land a decent job subsequently. Following reasons will further elaborate on this issue.
The most prominent point to be mentioned is that studying a wide range of academic subjects has profound impacts on the future job which someone can land. In other words, it is a way by which one can broaden their horizons and find a practical solution for any challenging situation. It is an undoubted fact that employers prefer to hire someone who is capable of analyzing different aspects of a problem before arriving a decision. For instance, a colleague of mine is graduated from both electrical engineering and Italian literature minor. Although at first glance, they might seem irrelevant, he handled a significant meeting with our Italian customer using his broad knowledge in both majors.
My second rationale is rooted in the fact that some subjects can complement each other perfectly. Actually, some subjects can become more effective when they are introduced beside other major or even majors. As a matter of fact, the world is based on inevitable basic concepts that we cannot eliminate them from any subjects, and students who want to be an expert in their field of study should have enough knowledge in these basic fields as well. Consider my own experience which can shed some light on this issue. I was always suffering from a lack of knowledge in chemistry subject as an electrical engineer. It may sound irrelevant, but when I was working on a project about batteries it was necessary for me to know about principal concepts of their chemical characteristics.
Last but not least, according to recent studies, people often prefer spending their time on diverse tasks compared to only one thing which might become boring after a while. Not to mention that homogenous subjects can easily demotivate students. Flipping to the other side of the coin, students who are studying different subjects have more options to enjoy. Take my own experience as an example. In my junior year, our syllabus was included various subjects ranging from mathematics to geology and I really had the enthusiasm to join these different classes. Consequently, I studied passionately and ranked the first student among my classmates.
To wrap it up, based on the ideas that were presented above, I highly believe that people should not focus on only one academic subject to stand out in this crowded world and find a job by enhancing their knowledge. However, we cannot use this opinion as a prescription, and more studies are required to answer this question precisely.
- TPO24 83
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
- TPO24 – Independent: A/D? One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 76
- TPO11. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to so much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 80
- Do you agree or disagree?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ired to answer this question precisely.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, thus, well, while, apart from, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2510.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05030181087 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76473542463 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543259557344 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 787.5 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4781338423 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.583333333 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7083333333 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.79166666667 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190013278563 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498135308995 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488886545856 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105558833158 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312710310517 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.